On Aug 19, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Jos De Roo jos.de...@agfa.com wrote:
Hi Gregg,
Thanks for the report.
Not sure why the EYE reasoner EARL-report
https://raw.github.com/RubenVerborgh/EyeEarl/earl/earl-report.ttl
was not included in
*** Apologies for multiple postings ***
The Web and Internet Science (WAIS) Research Group at the University of
Southampton is offering 3 fully-funded PhD studentships to begin in
October 2013.
The PhD Studentships will be aligned with the EPSRC-funded collaborative
interdisciplinary
Hi Laurens,
I would strongly appreciate it if you could spare 5 minutes filling in this
questionnaire [1].
Done!!
If this didn't convince you to participate in the questionnaire, then see the
questionnaire as an opportunity to send me feature requests, or to move your
feature requests
Hello Barry
I had a reminder today that I never answered the question below, and I
am very late indeed !
Properties and classes of all vocabularies in LOV are aggregated in a
triple store
of which SPARQL endpoint is at http://lov.okfn.org/endpoint/lov_aggregator
This is quite raw data but you
Thanks, Bernard.
I get ~5000 instances of rdf:Property (and 1643 of rdfs:Class - and
oddly 5 instances of rdfs:Property), but more than three times as many for:
SELECT (COUNT(?property) AS ?properties)
{
SELECT DISTINCT ?property
WHERE{
{?property rdfs:domain ?domain}
UNION
On Aug 19, 2013, at 11:07 AM, Jos De Roo jos.de...@agfa.com wrote:
Hi Gregg,
Thanks for the report.
Not sure why the EYE reasoner EARL-report
https://raw.github.com/RubenVerborgh/EyeEarl/earl/earl-report.ttl
was not included in
Hi Gregg,
Report updated with your latest results. Note that doap:name was set to
node-n3, which is used to display the name of the project; this conflicts
with Ruben's node-n3 report; I took the liberty of changing it to EYE,
which was used in dc:title.
Thanks for pointing that out; has
Hi Bernard,
And if you are going to change things…
I went looking for equivalences (:-)), and found a lot (but not all) of
owl:sameAs dbpedia objects that seem to have crept in as strings, e.g.
http://rdf.muninn-project.org/ontologies/military#Battalion owl:sameAs
dbpedia:Battalion
Hi Hugh,
[[ My 2 cents ]]
I went looking for equivalences (:-)), and found a lot (but not all) of
owl:sameAs dbpedia objects that seem to have crept in as strings, e.g.
http://rdf.muninn-project.org/ontologies/military#Battalion owl:sameAs
dbpedia:Battalion
I thing that comes from the
Thanks Ghislain, the right response :-)
(It's not our data, if it gets fixed at source we will re-acquire)
I think I tracked down the email of the person responsible, so have raised the
issue.
Best
Hugh
On 20 Aug 2013, at 20:13, Ghislain Atemezing auguste.atemez...@eurecom.fr
wrote:
Hi Hugh,
Guilty as charged. Need to fix that.
best,
rhw
On 2013-08-20, at 3:13 PM, Ghislain Atemezing wrote:
Hi Hugh,
[[ My 2 cents ]]
I went looking for equivalences (:-)), and found a lot (but not all) of
owl:sameAs dbpedia objects that seem to have crept in as strings, e.g.
11 matches
Mail list logo