On 02 Dec 2013, at 15:22 , Richard Light rich...@light.demon.co.uk wrote:
On 02/12/2013 11:10, Karl Dubost wrote:
Le 2 déc. 2013 à 06:00, Richard Light rich...@light.demon.co.uk
a écrit :
By this, I mean an application programming interface (API) for [RDF
graphs], which will be a
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/
Why did it die?
Lack of interest:-( There were no real uptake in the idea neither by users
nor
by implementers. It really was heading for a paper-only specification. It
seems that this direction was not what the community wanted at large.
..though maybe it
Dear Public-LOD,
As different Web browsers support different video codecs, with Web
video it is not uncommon to see things like the below (simplified for
legibility reasons)…
video
source src=./video.ogv type=…
source src=./video.mp4 type=…
/video
When I want to make statements
On 12/4/13 10:13 AM, Thomas Steiner wrote:
Dear Public-LOD,
As different Web browsers support different video codecs, with Web
video it is not uncommon to see things like the below (simplified for
legibility reasons)…
video
source src=./video.ogv type=…
source src=./video.mp4
On 12/4/13 10:54 AM, Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche wrote:
Hi all,
you can find more information on what has changed since the last
version here:
http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/dif/dif_schema_1.0d-1.0e.html
The Schema.org entry on LOV is as well updated (versions file and
difference can be
Hi again,
Thanks for your reply, Kingsley.
http://ex.org/video.mp4 denotes one entity.
http://ex.org/video.ogv denotes another.
We agree on that. I guess my question boils down to how to avoid
having to make duplicate statements about each resource? I cannot
take your proposed
Dear Linked Data community,
We are pleased to invite you to the 1st Session of the International
e-Conference on Germplasm Data Interoperability that will take place
online on December 6th, 2013 and will last 2 hours between 15.00-17.00
CET. We will be discussing about open data, linked data and
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Thomas Steiner to...@google.com wrote:
Hi again,
Thanks for your reply, Kingsley.
http://ex.org/video.mp4 denotes one entity.
http://ex.org/video.ogv denotes another.
well, it is actually up to the owner of the namespace to decide what those
On 12/4/13 12:24 PM, Thomas Steiner wrote:
Hi again,
Thanks for your reply, Kingsley.
http://ex.org/video.mp4 denotes one entity.
http://ex.org/video.ogv denotes another.
We agree on that. I guess my question boils down to how to avoid
having to make duplicate statements about each resource?
On Dec 4, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Thomas Steiner to...@google.com wrote:
Hi again,
Thanks for your reply, Kingsley.
http://ex.org/video.mp4 denotes one entity.
http://ex.org/video.ogv denotes another.
We agree on that. I guess my question boils down to how to avoid
having to make
Swell stuff!
Are there plans to bring the previously published draft specification on
the Google Developer site [1] in line with this new specification on
schema.org?
Properties only on schema.org:
confirmationNumber
discount / discountCode / discountCurrency
isGift
orderedItem
paymentDue /
On 04/12/2013 10:42, Armando Stellato wrote:
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-api/
Why did it die?
Lack of interest:-( There were no real uptake in the idea neither by users
nor
by implementers. It really was heading for a paper-only specification. It
seems that this direction was not what the
12 matches
Mail list logo
