Dear all,
here’s another paper that discusses different approaches:
http://carsten.io/trame-kessler-kuhn-cosit2013.pdf
Best,
Carsten
---
Carsten Kessler – http://carsten.io
Center for Advanced Research of Spatial Information
Department of Geography
Hunter College – CUNY
695 Park Avenue
New
Submission Deadline Extended: July 12th, 2013 at 23:59 (UTC−10:00
Hawaii Time zone)!
3rd International Workshop on Linked Science 2013—Supporting
Reproducibility, Scientific Investigations and Experiments (LISC2013)
When: October 21st or 22nd, 2013
Where: Sydney Masonic Conference Function
We had this discussion among the Linked Science workshop organizers
several times. I'm with Paul, I think that a human-readable
description is central to the dissemination of research results (and
will probably remain for the foreseeable future). I'm not saying that
PDF is the best way to do this,
Dear LODers,
I have already bugged this list with our Humanitarian eXchange Language project
a couple times, and I'd like to hear your opinion on the following problem.
We are constantly working on the vocabulary (see
http://hxl.humanitarianresponse.info/ for the latest version), so it gets
Dear Kingsley,
But this is what (most?) triple stores do with the default graph in the
absence of FROM/NAMED clauses in queries anyway. (Certainly this is the
Sesame approach, followed by OWLIM.)
Not so re. Virtuoso. The Graph IRIs don't matter. Only used them if you
explicitly seek to
Hi David,
select ?s ?p ?o where {
graph ?g1 { ?g http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/maker
http://www.brunni.de/foaf.rdf#me }
graph ?g { ?s :p1 ?o .
?s :p2 ?o .}
}
So we'd have to do (assuming all graph metadata are stored in the same graph):
select ?s ?p ?o where
), and whether you see an alternative approach?
Thanks,
Carsten
---
Dr. Carsten Keßler
http://carsten.io
+49 (0) 251 83 39764
Linked Open Data University of Münster → http://lodum.de
Münster Semantic Interoperability Lab → http://musil.uni-muenster.de
Institute for Geoinformatics → http://ifgi.uni
Hi Bob,
At a first glance, your ontology looks very interesting and well designed.
thanks, we are doing our best ;)
So there might be the (rather old) need for
statement identifiers, i.e., a URI (or maybe also a bnode) for identifying a
single triple and to be able to describe external
Hi Gannon,
I agree with the comments below. I think what Bob is suggesting is that you
include a non-ontology Core (DCMI for example).
I am not sure whether I get that correctly, but it is pretty clear to
use that we need something like this. We are already using some of the
DCMI properties
University, UK
- Frank van Harmelen, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Carsten Keßler, University of Muenster, Germany
- Kerstin Kleese-Van Dam, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, USA
- Eric G. Stephan, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, USA
- Jun Zhao, University of Oxford, UK
10 matches
Mail list logo
