Talis has written about this issue or encouraged others to write for quite a
while. Here are a few links. There are probably others I have forgotten
about.
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2010/02/sharing-data-on-the-web.php
Very nice!
On 8 Sep 2011 17:58, Bill Roberts b...@swirrl.com wrote:
The list might be interested in a prototype application built by Steve
Peters that visualises and links up data on:
- the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation from
http://opendatacommunities.org (which I was involved with)
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:22 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
On 2011-06 -16, at 16:41, Ian Davis wrote:
The problem here is that there are so few things that people want to
say about web pages compared
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
On 2011-06 -17, at 08:51, Ian Davis wrote:
If you use HTTP 200 for something different, then
you break my ability to look at a page, review it, and then
express my review in RDF, using the page's URI as the identifier
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
Not quite. It is saying that you can't give a review for my
http://foobar.gov.uk/datasets/population web page because the RDF
returned by the URI says it denotes a dataset not the web page. You can
still review the dataset
Small typo changed the meaning of what I was saying:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:18 PM, Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote:
OK, we differ here then. I would prefer to bookmark the movie because
that's what I'm interested in. The page will change over the years but
the movie will still persist
Tim,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Tim Berners-Lee ti...@w3.org wrote:
I don't think 303 is a quick and dirty hack.
It does mean a large extension of HTTP to be uses with non-documents.
It does have efficiency problems.
It is an architectural extension to the web architecture.
We have
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
With the second issue it's not so clear what to do about it. It's a question
of good practice, and I'm not aware of any document where that recommendation
could be easily added.
Maybe it could be written up as a
Christopher,
I really don't see why I should have to reengineer my entire toolchain
simply to consume your proprietary format. It is well known that the
standard for information interchange is the Microsoft Word 97 document
format which is easily read by every popular computing package. I for one
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.de wrote:
Taking advantage of one of PDF's many advantages, we plan to present the
first printed and bound version of the complete Linked PDF Data at next
years' LDOW workshop. Order your copy now! Shipping fees not included.
Please try http://schemapedia.com/ and see if it meets your needs.
On 13 Mar 2011 16:23, Dieter Fensel dieter.fen...@sti2.at wrote:
Dear all,
for a number of projects I was searching for vocabularies/Ontologies
to describe linked data. Could you please recommend me places
where to look for
Is the number of triples that important? With all respect to the
people on this list, I think there's a tendency to obsess over triple
counts. Aren't we past that bootstrap phase of being awed when we see
millions of triples being produced? I thought we'd moved towards
being more focussed on
Hi,
I did something very similar to Google Squared in small php script a
couple of years ago:
http://iandavis.com/2009/lodgrid/?store=spacequery=jupitercolumns=6
It uses linked data held in the Talis Platform and the platform's full
text search service.
More examples linked from the main page:
and return results from nasa and dbpedia?Juan
Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote:
Hi,
I did something very similar to Google Squared in small php script a
couple of years ago:
http://iandavis.com/2009/lodgrid
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Pete Johnston wrote:
This document mentions the following class
It's all very simple really, when you remove all the conflated terms.
I am not conflating terms and nor is my example, but I think you are (see below)
What is
I wrote up a summary of the current thinking on using 200 instead of
303 to serve up Linked Data:
http://iand.posterous.com/a-guide-to-publishing-linked-data-without-red
The key part is:
When your webserver receives a GET request to your thing’s URI you may
respond with a 200 response code and
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Leigh Dodds leigh.do...@talis.com wrote:
So here's a couple of questions for those of you on the list who have
implemented Linked Data tools, applications, services, etc:
* Do you rely on or require HTTP 303 redirects in your application? Or
does your app just
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
Not necessarily. If you take your ex:isDescribedBy predicate and add
that to a triple store where the non-Information-Resource resources are
identified using hash URIs, then the SPARQL query is just:
DESCRIBE uri ?res
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Phil Archer ph...@w3.org wrote:
I share John's unease here. And I remain uneasy about the 200 C-L solution.
I know I sound like a fundamentalist in a discussion where we're trying to
find a practical, workable solution, but is a description of a toucan a
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-12#page-14
snipped and fuller version inserted:
4. If the response has a Content-Location header field, and that URI
is not the same as the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
URI resolution is essentially:
dereference( uri.toAbsolute() );
Which gives us the simplicity and semantic indirection which we need. Use
frags, forget HTTP, know that uri#frag is never going to be a document
(unless you
Hi all,
To aid discussion I create a small demo of the idea put forth in my
blog post http://iand.posterous.com/is-303-really-necessary
Here is the URI of a toucan:
http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
Here is the URI of a description of that toucan:
http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan.rdf
As
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:54 AM, William Waites w...@styx.org wrote:
Provenance and debugging. It would be quite possible to
record the fact that this set of triples, G, were obtained
by dereferencing this uri N, at a certain time, from a
certain place, with a request that looked like this and
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
What's the point in you saying:
/toucan a :Toucan; :describedBy /doc .
If the rest of the world is saying:
/toucan a :Document; :primaryTopic ex:Toucan .
Follow?
Because the data obtained by dereferencing /toucan is
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Not at all, I'm saying that if big-corp makes a /web crawler/ that describes
what documents are about and publishes RDF triples, then if you use 200 OK,
throughout the web you'll get (statements similar to) the following
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
and if I publish:
http://webr3.org/nathan#me :isKingOf :TheWorld .
it's authorative and considered true?
great news all round :)
No :)
I mean't that when you dereference
http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan, the triples you
Hi David,
Rather than respond to each of your points let me say that I agree
with most of them :) I have snipped away the things I agree with in
principle, and left the things I want to discuss further.
I have a question about http://thing-described-by.org/ - how does it
work when my
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
I'll roll with the who cares line of thinking, I certainly don't care how
you or dbpedia or foaf or dc publish your data, so long as I can deref it,
but for god sake don't go telling everybody using slash URIs and 200 is The
Right
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Jörn Hees j_h...@cs.uni-kl.de wrote:
If I GET http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan i retrieve a document (I'll call
this A) with rdf statements.
This is not correct. You receive a response with an entity: the
representation. (Here entity is used in the rfc2616
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
However, if you use 303's the then first GET redirects there, then you store
the ontology against the redirected-to URI, you still have to do 40+ GETs
but each one is fast with no response-body (ontology sent down the wire)
then
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray nor...@astro.gla.ac.uk wrote:
httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI
with a 303 MAY be a NIR.
Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR,
in the sense that it is defeasibly taken
Kingsley,
My only gripe is with mutual exclusion. ..dropping 303... didn't come
across as adding an option to the mix. Ditto positioning 303 as a mandate,
which it's never really been.
I think you read too much conspiracy into 140 characters.
Ian
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Better clear that up, noticed that it's an age old XHTML-RDFa potential
issue, so I'll see if we can get it covered in the WG and relay back to the
TAG to hopefully clear the issue.
Suppose I assign the ID 'mars' to represent the
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Robert Fuller robert.ful...@deri.org wrote:
I submitted both urls to sindice earlier. Both were indexed and have the
same content. In the search results[1] one displays with title A Toucan,
the other with title, A Description of a Toucan.
Hi all,
The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last
night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303
redirect approach for Linked Data. My suggestion is that replacing it
with a 200 is in practice harmless and that nothing actually breaks on
the web.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Ian,
Q: Is 303 really necessary?
A: Yes, it is.
Why? Read on...
I don't think you explain this in your email.
What's the problem with having many options re. mechanics for associating an
HTTP based Entity
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 11/4/10 10:22 AM, Ian Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
Ian,
Q: Is 303 really necessary?
A: Yes, it is.
Why? Read on...
I don't think you explain
] http://www.cs.vu.nl/~pmika/swc/submissions/swc2010_submission_19.pdf
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Ian Davis m...@iandavis.com wrote:
Hi all,
The subject of this email is the title of a blog post I wrote last
night questioning whether we actually need to continue with the 303
redirect
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Giovanni Tummarello
giovanni.tummare...@deri.org wrote:
I think it's an orthogonal issue to the one RDFa solves. How should I
use RDFa to respond to requests to http://iandavis.com/id/me which is
a URI that denotes me?
hashless?
mm one could be to return
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
I don't presume. I prefer to use terms that are familiar with the
people on this list who might be reading the message. Introducing
unnecessary capitalised phrases distracts from the message.
Again, you presume.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 11/4/10 11:50 AM, Giovanni Tummarello wrote:
its up to clients to really care about the distinction, i personally
know of no useful clients for the web of data that will visibly
misbehave if a person is mistaken
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Robin YANG yang.squ...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, yes, we can use ontology or ex:isDescribedBy, but none of solution
explained what happens when you dereferencing the URI over HTTP which you
just used to refer to the non-information resources.
Don't u need 303 or hash
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:56 PM, David Wood da...@3roundstones.com wrote:
Hi all,
This is a horrible idea, for the following reasons (in my opinion and
suitably caveated):
- Some small number of people and organizations need to provide back-links on
the Web since the Web doesn't
On Thursday, November 4, 2010, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Please, don't.
303 is a PITA, and it has detrimental affects across the board from network
load through to server admin. Likewise #frag URIs have there own set of PITA
features (although they are nicer on the network and
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
You see it's not about what we say, it's about what other say, and if 10
huge corps analyse the web and spit out billions of triples saying that
anything 200 OK'd is a document, then at the end when we consider the RDF
graph of
On Thursday, November 4, 2010, Jörn Hees j_h...@cs.uni-kl.de wrote:
Hi Ian,
From your blogpost:
Under my new scheme:
GET /toucan responds with 200 and a representation containing some RDF which
includes the triples /toucan ex:owner /anna and /toucan
ex:isDescribedBy /doc
GET /doc responds
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi Ian,
Thanks, I can confirm the change has been successful :)
However, one small note is that the conneg URIs such as
http://productdb.org/gtin/00319980033520 do not expose the header, thus
can't be used.
Ta. These should be
Hi Nathan,
I implemented this header on http://productdb.org/ (since I had the
code open). Can someone comfirm that it does what's expected (i.e.
allows off-domain requesting of data from productdb.org)
One important thing to note. The PHP snippet you gave was slightly
wrong. The correct form
Guillermo,
This is a very nice demo, well done!
Is the architecture generic enough to apply to other datasets?
Musicbrainz would be a good one once the new linked data version is
ready.
Cheers,
Ian
2010/10/17 Guillermo Álvaro Rey galv...@isoco.com:
Dear LODers,
We have created a simple
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Michael Schneider schn...@fzi.de wrote:
Sören Auer wrote:
PS: Please also keep in mind that PUBLINK is very limited (max. 3-5 data
owning organizations) and ca. 10 man days of support for each.
I think those numbers are the really important bits. I have seen EU
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
Dear all,
I've created a think RDF wrapper around the WordNet 3.0 database (nouns
only). For example:
http://ontologi.es/WordNet/data/Fool
Great work.
There is a SPARQL'able version of Wordnet 3.0 available via the Talis
Hi Bernard,
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote:
Basically that's it. If this practice seems good from social and technical
viewpoint it could be a good idea to document it in a more formal way and
put it somewhare on the wiki. There has been a
2010/7/6 Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org:
2010/7/6 Jiří Procházka oji...@gmail.com:
It would have a meaning. It would just be a false statement. The
same as the following is a false statement:
foaf:Person a rdf:Property .
Why do you think so?
I believe it is valid RDF and even valid
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
Jeremy, your argument is perfectly sound from your company's POV, but not
from a broader perspective. Of course, any change will incur costs by those
who have based their assumptions upon no change happening. Your company took
a
Patrick,
Without disputing your wider point that HTML hit the sweet point of
usability and utility I will dispute the following:
HTML 3.2 did have:
1) *A need perceived by users as needing to be met*
Did users really know they wanted to link documents together to form a
world wide web? I
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:19 AM, Patrick Durusau patr...@durusau.net wrote:
I make this point in another post this morning but is your argument that
investment by vendors =
I think I just answered it there, before reading this message. Let me
know if not!
Ian
Ian
Yves,
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
First: this is *not* a dirty hack.
Brickley bif:contains ckley is a perfectly valid thing to say.
You could, today, use data: URIs to represent literals with no change
to any RDF system.
Ian
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Jeremy Carroll jer...@topquadrant.com wrote:
On 7/2/2010 12:00 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
Or maybe we should all just take a weekend break, mull things over for
a couple of days, and start fresh on monday? That's my plan anyhow...
Yeah, maybe some of us could
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
Congratulations on the publication of this ontology! I've added it to
Hi all,
Now we are getting a steady growth in the number of Linked Data sites,
products and services I thought it was time to create a low-volume
announce list for Linked Data related announcements so people can keep
up to date without needing to wade through the LOD discussion.
You can join the
Hi you could use
http://open.vocab.org/terms/businessCard
There is also a proposal to add a similar property to FOAF at
http://wiki.foaf-project.org/w/term_businessCard
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Felix Ostrowski
felix.ostrow...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
vCards in RDF seem to be a good
Hi Nathan,
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Could everybody publishing linked data please note that open data isn't
currently retrievable via client side JS libraries due to same origin
policies and the likes.
In order to make it open and accessible by UAs we
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
Bills the major operative word in a world where the Bill Payer and
Database Maintainer is a footnote (at best) re. perception of what
constitutes the DBpedia Project.
If dbpedia.org linked to the sparql endpoints of
Kingsley,
You should address your question directly to the project organisers,
we're a technology provider and host some of the data but it is not up
to us when or where the dumps get shared. My understanding is that
because this is officially sanctioned data they want to ensure that
the
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Ian Davis wrote:
Kingsley,
You should address your question directly to the project organisers,
we're a technology provider and host some of the data but it is not up
to us when or where the dumps get shared. My
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Annotation publishing pattern section there is the following statement:
It is entirely consistent with the Linked Data principles to make
statements about third-party resources.
I don't believe that to be
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
I really don't believe we achieve much via:
link rel=primarytopic
href=http://education.data.gov.uk/id/school/56; /
primarytopic isn't an IANA registered type link.
Yes, I know. Nor is foaf:primaytopic :)
I
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Ed Summers e...@pobox.com wrote:
I also agree w/ Kingsley that it would be neat to also have a link
pattern that non-RDFa folks could use:
link rel=http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/primaryTopic;
href=http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mogwai_(band) title=Mogwai /
I have
The Fresnel Path Language was submitted as a note to the W3C a while back:
http://www.w3.org/2005/04/fresnel-info/fsl/
I implemented that in PHP as part of the moriarty library:
http://code.google.com/p/moriarty/source/browse/trunk/graphpath.class.php
I think FSL is very interesting (having
You may find something useful in my Moriarty project:
http://code.google.com/p/moriarty/
It's geared towards the Talis Platform but there is a lot of code in
there that has no dependencies on the platform, e.g.:
http://code.google.com/p/moriarty/source/browse/trunk/httprequest.class.php
some
I assume you've noticed the dearth of RDF examples that include descriptions
of RDF files that are distinct, but connected, to the file contents.
People have been doing that for years using foaf:primaryTopic. See
example at http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_PersonalProfileDocument
and
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
If you lookup Linked Data from spaces associated with myself of OpenLink you
will see use the aforementioned property re. missing relation. Also, you may
also find out that few people added the missing triple to
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
The necessary declaration of document as distinct, and yet necessary
for the definition of data, and the necessity of different URI's for
these two concepts, are fundamental sticking points for many people.
Who is
Hi all,
I am delivering a Semantic Web track keynote at Online Information
this year( http://www.online-information.co.uk/ ) on the subject of
The Reality of Linked Data.
I want to showcase the work of the community in putting Linked Data to
work and bringing real benefit to end users. I am
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Ross Singerrossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyway, yes, I think some more thought needs to go into Dewey and
LCSH's relationship to the real world.
I think http://www.flickr.com/photos/danbri/3282565132 might be relevant here
The classification that danbri uses in
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Panzer,Michaelpanz...@oclc.org wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to announce the availability of the DDC Summaries as a linked
data service that uses SKOS and other vocabularies for representation [1].
Please take a look if you like. Comments, suggestions, and
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Toby Inkstert...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
Does anyone know of any vocabs that provide terms like these? If not,
shall I add to the VoCampBristol2009 todo list?
Maybe my first ever RDF schema would be useful:
http://vocab.org/barter/0.1/
Ian
Have you looked into changesets which is used by the Talis Platform?
See http://n2.talis.com/wiki/Changesets and
http://vocab.org/changeset/schema.html
Ian
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Axel Rauschmayera...@rauschma.de wrote:
Offhand, I see the following requirements for many (mostly
I wrote up some background to licensing, waivers, the public domain and how
it applies to linked data. I also included examples of how you can declare a
public domain waiver for a linked dataset.
http://blogs.talis.com/nodalities/2009/07/linked-data-public-domain.php
Hope this helps people with
On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, Sören Auer a...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
On behalf of the AKSW research group [1] I'm pleased to announce the first
public version of the LinkedGeoData.org datasets and services.
LinkedGeoData is a comprehensive dataset derived from the
On Wednesday, July 8, 2009, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 15:13 +0100, Mark Birbeck wrote:
The original point of this thread seemed to me to be saying that if
.htaccess is the key to the semantic web, then it's never going to
happen.
It simply isn't the key to the
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
My comments are still fundamentally about my preference for CC-BY-SA.
Hence the transcopyright reference :-)
I want Linked Data to have its GPL equivalent; a license scheme that:
Have you read the licenses at
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
The NYT, London Times, and others of this ilk, are more likely to
contribute their quality data to the LOD cloud if they know there is a
vehicle (e.g., a license scheme) that ensures their HTTP URIs are protected
Hi all,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
All,
As you may have noticed, AWS still haven't made the LOD cloud data sets --
that I submitted eons ago -- public. Basically, the hold-up comes down to
discomfort with the lack of license clarity re.
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:01 AM, Giovanni Tummarello g.tummare...@gmail.com
wrote:
Just a remark about what we're doing in Sindice, for all who want to
be indexed properly by us.
we recursively dereference the properties that are used thus trying to
obtain a closure over the description of
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:12 AM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On 23/6/09 11:01, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
And Michael, please be frank - there is a tendency in the LOD community
which goes along the lines of OWL and DL-minded SW research has proven
obsolete anyway, so we LOD guys
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
Using licensing to ensure the data providers URIs are always preserved
delivers low cost and implicit attribution. This is what I believe CC-BY-SA
delivers. There is nothing wrong with granular attribution if
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/24 Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com
wrote:
Using licensing to ensure the data providers URIs are always preserved
delivers low cost
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:14 AM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 01:03 +0100, Hugh Glaser wrote:
On 15/06/2009 00:18, Toby A Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
I still need to add some 303 redirects in there.
Better hurry up, people might find it...
else to polish.
Anyway, Happy Birthday!, a brand new present:
http://biolit.rkbexplorer.com/
Hugh
On 14/06/2009 10:23, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
It's Ian Davis' birthday tomorrow, and for it he wants some linked data.
So what datasets does anyone know of that can
Congratulations! This looks really good
On Thursday, June 11, 2009, Andraz Tori and...@zemanta.com wrote:
Hi guys,
today, a small consortium of web companies and one institute
(AdaptiveBlue, DERI (NUI Galway), Faviki, Freebase, Yahoo!, Zemanta, and
Zigtag) released a format specifying
I'd like to attend but that wiki page appears to be locked for edits, so I
can't add myself. Can you add me?
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
All,
If you're attending the Semantic Web Technologies 2009 Conference in San
Jose, note that there will
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
All,
The 30+ xslt stylesheets [1]used by the our collection Sponger
Cartridges are now available for community development and enhancement
via a github [2].
Links:
1.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Michael Hausenblas
michael.hausenb...@deri.org wrote:
With the recent uptake of structured data/RDF by major players such as
Google the motivation for exposing relational data and other structured
data
sources on the Web entered a new stage. We encourage
Hi all,
I'm not aware of any official policy on commercial posts to this list, but
usual mailing list etiquette generally recommends that postings about
commercial services and products should indicate their nature and give some
indication of cost. I think this is even more important when the
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Tim Berners-Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-11 -17, at 11:27, John Goodwin wrote:
[...]
I'd be tempted to generalise or just remove the domain/range
restrictions. Any thoughts?
There are lots of uses for rand and domain.
One is in the user interface
I wonder if we could highlight those doing a great job in this space more,
e.g. I believe Opera's foaf output is LOD
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Tom Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sad but true. Things are improving in my experience but we still have
some evangelism to do in this area.
== Linked Data Developer ==
Our platform development group is responsible for making sure that the
Talis Platform is the premier environment for developing and delivering
great Semantic Web applications. We need your help to convert and
generate Linked Data sets for use by these and other
98 matches
Mail list logo
