On 07/10/2014 14:33, Gray, Alasdair a.j.g.g...@hw.ac.uk wrote:
On 3 Oct 2014 16:06, Phillip Lord phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk wrote:
Eric Prud'hommeaux e...@w3.org writes:
Let's work through the requirements and a plausible migration plan.
We need:
1 persistent storage: it's hard to
Hello
(Pretty sure I've made this comment before so please forgive any signs of
premature senility)
I think this may be an unfortunate side effect of the conflation of the
303 (I can't send that) pattern with the content negotiation (what
flavour would you like) pattern
Lots of linked data
at the BBC - essentially dealing with the fact that
the server doesn't know about what comes after the #
Thanks
Bill
On 23 Jul 2014, at 13:52, Michael Smethurst michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk
wrote:
Hello
(Pretty sure I've made this comment before so please forgive any signs
of
premature
Oops, dropped laptop :-/
Continues
On 23/07/2014 14:50, Michael Smethurst michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Bill
Bit of a difficult question to answer because the reality is probably
still quite disjointed. Various parts of bbc.co.uk:
- serve linked data
- store data as rdf
Regards,
John Walker
On July 23, 2014 at 3:55 PM Michael Smethurst
michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
Oops, dropped laptop :-/
Continues
On 23/07/2014 14:50, Michael Smethurst michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk
wrote:
Hi Bill
Bit of a difficult question to answer because
Hi Kingsley
Very definitely starting to feel like deja vu...
On 23/07/2014 20:18, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 7/23/14 2:05 PM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
For internal usage it's all probably fine. But I still think it's a
pattern that shouldn't be generally encouraged.
Its
On 23/07/2014 21:49, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 7/23/14 3:40 PM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Kingsley
Very definitely starting to feel like deja vu...
On 23/07/2014 20:18, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 7/23/14 2:05 PM, Michael Smethurst wrote
On 30/03/2012 16:15, Tom Heath tom.he...@talis.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On 27 March 2012 16:17, Michael Smethurst michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
On 26/03/2012 17:13, Tom Heath tom.he...@talis.com wrote:
Hi Jeni,
On 26 March 2012 16:47, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote
On 27/03/2012 18:12, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 12:35 PM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
On 27/03/2012 16:53, Kingsley Idehenkide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 11:17 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
No sane publisher trying to handle a decent amount
On 26/03/2012 17:13, Tom Heath tom.he...@talis.com wrote:
Hi Jeni,
On 26 March 2012 16:47, Jeni Tennison j...@jenitennison.com wrote:
Tom,
On 26 Mar 2012, at 16:05, Tom Heath wrote:
On 23 March 2012 15:35, Steve Harris steve.har...@garlik.com wrote:
I'm sure many people are just
On 27/03/2012 16:53, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 3/27/12 11:17 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
No sane publisher trying to handle a decent amount of traffic is gonna
follow the dbpedia pattern of doing it in one step (conneg to 303) and
picking up 2 server hits per
Hello!
Don't want to sound hopelessly naive but for one second (until the nomenclature
wars reignited) I did see a small chink of agreement there.
Paraphrasing I think Leigh was saying the resource / representation split was
already quite an abstraction and enough for most people in most
On 20/10/2011 01:18, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Dave Reynolds wrote:
The problem, as I see it, is that developers start from the NIR but then
use web browsers to find their way round the data and then cut paste the
browser locations they find, thus ending up with IRs where they should
On 20/10/2011 00:35, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
On 18 Oct 2011, at 14:49, Michael Smethurst wrote:
On 18/10/2011 11:30, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
snip
So can I infer from this?:
In a world where I only have one of animals (1) and (2) (despite
Yes, like I say, I think you agreed
Nothing to be ashamed of :--Z
On 20/10/2011 12:21, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 10/20/11 2:38 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
RE: Explaining the benefits of http-range14 (was Re: [HTTP-range-14]
Hyperthing: Semantic Web URI
On 18/10/2011 11:30, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hi.
On 18 Oct 2011, at 10:57, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Bernard
Glad to hear I¹m finally making sense to someone... :-/
I think I might be still with you ;-)
And finding the discussion very helpful - thanks.
And I'm
for an IR, here it is, and in the format you've
asked.
Do I get your point correctly?
Bernard
2011/10/18 Michael Smethurst michael.smethu...@bbc.co.uk
Hi Richard
(Again top post courtesy of webmail. sorry)
I'm saying dbpedia is missing the concept of a *generic* information resource
On 18/10/2011 11:30, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Hi.
On 18 Oct 2011, at 10:57, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Bernard
Glad to hear I¹m finally making sense to someone... :-/
I think I might be still with you ;-)
And finding the discussion very helpful - thanks.
And I'm
On 18/10/2011 12:26, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
On Tue, 2011-10-18 at 10:57 +0100, Michael Smethurst wrote:
All of the problems mentioned in this thread could be solved with the
addition of a *generic* information resource URI that does the conneg
I don't seem to be doing a such good job at lurking but I'd thought the current
argument against fragment ids was you always get a 200 (so long as the
information resource they hang off exists). So:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b006m86d#teddybearsandtrainsets
returns a 200 but that
(which is)
see mails passim :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rees [mailto:j...@creativecommons.org]
Sent: Tue 10/18/2011 6:27 PM
To: Michael Smethurst
Cc: Kingsley Idehen; public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Address Bar URI
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Michael Smethurst
michael.smethu
/2011 12:50 PM
To: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Address Bar URI
On 10/17/11 1:48 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Kingsley
I've heard you make this argument several times in the past. But I
don't understand why. How does it benefit publishers to expose the
representation address?
I am
[mailto:h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk]
Sent: Sat 10/15/2011 2:43 PM
To: Michael Smethurst
Cc: Norman Gray; Linking Open Data; Don Cruickshank
Subject: Re: Address Bar URI
Thanks Michael.
Very helpful to bring in the SEO perspective, even on a Friday evening.
On 14 Oct 2011, at 21:28, Michael Smethurst wrote
: public-lod-requ...@w3.org on behalf of Kingsley Idehen
Sent: Sun 10/16/2011 2:41 PM
To: public-lod@w3.org
Subject: Re: Address Bar URI
On 10/16/11 8:50 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:
Hi Hugh
Apologies for top post; blame webmail :-/
(Using labels as they appear in my head; feel free to translate
Have to say from a pragmatic point of view that using replaceState to switch
between IR and NIR (or whatever we're supposed to call them) URIs feels like
bad advice for most developers
Users in older browsers are going to see (and copy and paste) one set of URIs
whilst users of more modern
On 07/10/2010 11:58, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
Clearly this is an exciting thing to be doing, but I couldn't let Sören's
comments go :-)
On 07/10/2010 08:57, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 01:38 +0200, Sören Auer wrote:
On 07.10.2010
Hi John
Thanks for the tips. Seems our Chrome versions aren't quite the same. I'm on
MacOS (5.0.375.70) and...
On 23/06/2010 19:48, John Erickson olyerick...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's how you specific your language preferences in Chrome:
* In the Customize menu (the wrench) select Options
I
Hello
Just chipping in from a publisher's perspective. The /data and /page thing on
DBpedia always confused me a little. It seemed to make the assumption that
there was only one page (desktop html) and only one data view (RDF).
On bbc /programmes we have 2 pages (desktop html using
Hi Jun/all
Just noticed the line on:
http://esw.w3.org/topic/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData/DataSets/Statistics
saying:
BBC Later + TOTP (link not responding - 2009-04-01)
That's my bad. The site's been down since we forgot to pay our ec2 bills :-/
Having said that the data has
http://ontologi.es/rail/stations/gb/MAN.rdf
and wondering if there's some confusion between location and
administrative office / postal address.
in the case of piccadilly it's a complex of buildings. the admin
office / postal address is in a high rise alongside the actual station
and
know there was a database of all public transport nodes in the UK?
http://www.naptan.org.uk/
Michael Smethurst pointed me at this lately: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOPS
which is interesting at the level of identifying rolling stock (perhaps you
don't want to go quite that far :-)
http
another bit of a joined up bbc.co.uk clunks into place... mainly thru the
efforts of you people
if u were all in london and the bbc paid me enough i'd buy you all beers : )
btw:
http://www.slideshare.net/fantasticlife/semweb-at-the-bbc
is a presentation i gave (badly) the other day to various
Morning all
The site I'm working on uses microformats fairly heavily. And we've encountered
all the usual problems: accessibility, lack of namespacing / scope etc. Anyway
for accessibility reasons we've just updated our standards to prohibit the use
of the microformat abbreviation design
33 matches
Mail list logo
