Hi, I thought I would announce that I have a new TaxonConcept data set that
includes millions of entries from an EoL NLP project. This was many about
annotating the text corpus but the data set includes a lot of photos and
additional data.
IIt consists of 1,141,247 data objects:
Hi I am trying to make the data set from the EoL Smithsonian NLP project
available as simply as possible.
This mainly was done for an NLP project but it includes photographs etc.
and is pretty well interlinked with DBpedia and Uniprot.
I have two kinds of things
Taxa
To spare others from having to to through the entire OBO ontology thread, I
thought it would be helpful to make a more digestible summary.
I went to the page that the Hymenoptera Ontology Paper said was the site
for the ontology.
A Gross Anatomy Ontology for Hymenoptera
at 3:48 PM, Chris Mungall cjmung...@lbl.gov wrote:
OBO-Format is a subset of OWL2-DL
http://oboformat.org
Cheers
Chris
On Feb 22, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi Alan,
*We use OWL and the Virtuoso endpoint you are using doesn't understand
it.*
Isn't it more accurate
concern?
Respectfully,
- Pete
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Chris Mungall cjmung...@lbl.gov wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi Chris,
http://oboformat.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/obo-syntax.html#5
*On completions this section will define the semantics
will ask that this be added to Ontobee and the computers can use
that.
-Alan
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 2/23/12 1:32 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
However, I think testing using the Vapour Validator is easier to
understand.
This might
, Feb 22, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Alan,
Here is an example from the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology
http://obofoundry.org/cgi-bin/detail.cgi?id=hymenoptera_anatomy
Example via my endpoint
http://lsd.taxonconcept.org/describe/?url=http://purl.obolibrary.org
at this:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21388572
The implementation of the OBO to OWL mapping work is part of official Gene
Ontology project.
Juan Sequeda
+1-575-SEQ-UEDA
www.juansequeda.com
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
How do OBO type ontologies
, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Jerven,
Thank you for your response. Your reasoning makes sense to me and I like
the move to skos:broader and skos:narrower.
The problem that I have with subClassing is that some groups have made
sameAs links between *txn
,
Jerven Bolleman
On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:27 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to figure out the best way to deal with the following
problem.
There are entities that we see as species. (some argue if they are
real things or simply an artificial human construct.)
I
Hi All,
If you were to recommend how to markup the content providers listed on this
page how would you do it?
http://eol.org/content_partners
Would you use SIOC, DOAP or some other vocabulary?
What some would like is the ability to cite a content partner using just a
URI.
For example:
/content_partners/159
Bernard
2012/1/18 Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com
Hi All,
If you were to recommend how to markup the content providers listed on
this page how would you do it?
http://eol.org/content_partners
Would you use SIOC, DOAP or some other vocabulary?
What some would like
Hi All,
I is is my understanding that if we want to setup a web resource that
defines owl classes you can't use RDFa markup.
For instance, if I wanted to mint an owl class for the taxon group
Mammalia, I would need to do that in one of the following ways.
1) An OWL ontology created with
-assoc.comwrote:
On Jan 12, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi All,
I is is my understanding that if we want to setup a web resource that
defines owl classes you can't use RDFa markup.
RDFa can markup pretty much any RDF, but you might not always be able to
use the shortcuts
I think this is great, but I am wondering if there should be some way of
differentiating between the original endpoint and third-party endpoints.
The GeoSpecies/TaxonConcept endpoint is the same, but there are other
third-party endpoints.
I don't understand why the statistics for the
Hi Martin,
I have URI's where case is important only at the terminal identifier. (HTML
URI's in this example)
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p.html
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p.htmlshould be different than
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6N7p.html
Am I correct in thinking that
There was an earlier discussion on the pedantic list about how to markup a
geo:Point with an error measure.
The biodiversity informatics community has a similar problem with how to
annotate a species observation with some measure of extent plus error.
In addition to the error from the GPS
Thanks to everyone.
I fixed the issues with wdrs:describedby, used dcterms:hasFormat to link to
the PDF the #OriginalDescription section now shows.
txn:SpeciesOriginalDescription rdf:about=
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p#OriginalDescription;
!-- Ideally, this should link to a resource in
I was wondering if there is an existing predicate for linking to a PDF file?
I would like to incorporate a link between bibliographic reference
description and a URL to the location of a PDF of that document.
I had minted a predicate txn:hasPDFVersion, as demonstrated in this RDF
snippet. (Part
LinkedIn
I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
- Peter
Peter DeVries
Ph.D. Dissertator at Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin
Madison, Wisconsin Area
Confirm that you know Peter DeVries
https://www.linkedin.com/e/-6t5m3-ghnv04ot-59/isd
I was wondering if an example might help me understand this better.
I have currently been linking between entities and the RDF that describes
them using foaf:topic and foaf:page
If I understand this correctly, I would continue to use foaf:topic to point
from the RDF page to the entities it
Just to be clear, what should I be doing for my *txn* vocab?
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl
* The code below is partly the way it is because of how Protege seems to
want it.
rdf:RDF xmlns=ontology2;txn.owl#
xml:base=ontology2;txn.owl
Thanks Kingsley,
Once I saw it in URIburner, I understood :-) Thanks!
- Pete
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 10/11/10 4:54 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
Thanks very much Kingsley,
I thought I should better check that I have interpreted you
standard vocabulary like geonames to indicate the county or state
the observation was made.
Thanks Again,
- Pete
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Paul Houle ontolo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 5:28 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi LOD'ers,
There was some
After reviewing the feedback I created a test vocabulary and RDF file.
The test vocabulary is in it's own namespace and called dwc_area.
It is here: http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/dwc_area.owl
The HTML Document is here
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/dwc_area_doc/index.html (For some
/foaf/0.1/topic rdfs:isDefinedBy
http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/
Thanks :-)
- Pete
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.comwrote:
On 10/11/10 2:52 PM, Peter DeVries wrote:
After reviewing the feedback I created a test vocabulary and RDF file.
The test
Hi LOD'ers,
There was some discussion about ways to record species observations using
the geo vocabulary at a recent biodiversity informatics meeting.
Some see the advantages of using the geo standard, but we really need to
have a way to incorporate and error or extent in meters.
What would be
Thanks Bernard,
I will try that! :-)
- Pete
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Bernard Vatant
bernard.vat...@mondeca.comwrote:
Hi Peter
Something like the example below, but I suspect that this might not make it
a real geo:Point?
barely. The old maths teacher in me frowns at points having
google search for a given scientific name brings up all sorts of
poorly matched images and I suspect that the same might happen with linked
data.
Thanks Again,
- Pete
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.dewrote:
Peter,
On 17 Sep 2010, at 20:48, Peter DeVries wrote
I have updated the TaxonConcept Knowledge Base data set.
There are some changes that are worth mentioning.
There is an additional download file mentioned in the void and
sitemap.xml.gz
called *se_states.rdf.gz*
sc:dataDumpLocationhttp://lod.taxonconcept.org/txn_base.rdf.gz
match and then
will run the query you sent to get the latest info.
Thanks!
- Pete
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.dewrote:
Peter,
On 9 Sep 2010, at 02:54, Peter DeVries wrote:
I was wondering if anyone has figured out a way to generate the LOD
interlinking
ocs.geospecies.org sws.geonames.org 39
- Pete
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Richard,
You appear to be correct about versions. The public site is running the
ubuntu package which is a little order.
I have a private instance that is running
I was able to create a new OpenID and use that to update the documentation
for the following entries:
http://www.ckan.net/package/taxonconcept
http://www.ckan.net/package/geospecies
I have a number of links to GeoNames in GeoSpecies, but have not been able
to get a count yet.
This RDF will
I was wondering if anyone has figured out a way to generate the LOD
interlinking (InLinks/OutLinks) stats from a Virtuoso OpenSource SPARQL
Endpoint.
The two named graphs I am most interested in are:
urn:org:linkedopenspeciesdata:dataspace:taxonconcept *taxonconcept*
I am kind of annoyed by the CKAN site.
1) A lot of this information they are requesting are already provided by my
void file, sitemap.xml and SPARQL Endpoint
2) My google openID does not seem to work on this site and their are no
non-openid account setup alternative.
3) The TaxonConcept data set
be reasoned.
This sort of model for species range also seems to align well with
conventional GIS vector and raster models.
Cheers,
--
Sean
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Søren,
People will correct me if I am wrong but I think
of saying
Organism expectedIn geographicalArea
- Pete
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Bernard,
I was just looking through this spec yesterday. I am not sure. These would
be have circles of uncertainty around them, so to cover the earth they would
need
Hi Bernard,
I have skos mapping in both TaxonConcept and GeoSpecies.
See http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/mCcSp.rdf
And http://lod.geospecies.org/ses/mCcSp.rdf
Also EUNIS has skos mapping. It is RDFa
See http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910
These should be in the cloud as they were
.
eunis:SpeciesSynonym rdf:about=http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910
skos:closeMatch rdf:resource=
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/mCcSp#Species/
rdfs:seeAlso rdf:resource=http://eunis.eea.europa.eu/species/90910/
/eunis:SpeciesSynonym
- Pete
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Peter DeVries
,
- Pete
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:18 AM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 18:06:08 -0500
Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for
how they could be improved. :-)
The following:
@prefix txn
18:06:08 -0500
Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com wrote:
I would appreciate feedback on these models and any suggestions for
how they could be improved. :-)
The following:
@prefix txn: http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ontology/txn.owl# .
http://lod.taxonconcept.org/ses/mCcSp#Species
Hi Everyone,
I am working on a new model for species concepts at TaxonConcept.org.
These are an extension of my work on GeoSpecies, and are also designed to
investigate mapping names to concepts as part of the Global Names
Initiativehttp://gni.globalnames.org/
.
The main difference between
, instead of, say, dc:subject?)
I look forward to using this dataset -
Regards,
Joel.
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am working on a new model for species concepts at TaxonConcept.org.
These are an extension of my work on GeoSpecies, and are also designed
look forward to using this dataset -
Regards,
Joel.
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Peter DeVries wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am working on a new model for species concepts at TaxonConcept.org.
These are an extension of my work on GeoSpecies, and are also designed to
investigate mapping names to concepts
If by reasoning you mean formal logic, and if you want to stay in OWL
DL or some other computationally tractable RDF based language, I am
inclined to guess that you will be forced to make this conclusion
somewhat tautogical. In general you won't be able to use a single
predicate, e.g.
!
- Pete
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:19 AM, Leigh Dodds leigh.do...@talis.com wrote:
Hi Bob,
2009/12/4 Bob Morris morris@gmail.com:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
In the end, for ecological observations, it is likely
in the near future, so stay
tuned.
Cheers
Bernard
[1] http://blog.hubjects.com/2009/11/representation-as-translation.html
2009/11/30 Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com
Hi LOD'ers :-)
I am trying to work out some way to map the various semantic
representations for a species
Hi LOD'ers,
Richard Cyganiak was kind enough to suggest some fixes and changes, which
you can see on the new version.
http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ses/v6n7p.rdf
http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ont/txn_doc/index.html
http://rdf.taxonconcept.org/ont/void.rdf
I also made another change which I would
that will allow you to determine
which concept is the best match for the captured specimen.
*
*
At least that is what I would like to do. :-)
- Pete
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Bob Morris morris@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Peter DeVries pete.devr...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Hi LOD'ers :-)
I am trying to work out some way to map the various semantic representations
for a species, in conjunction with a friendly three letter organization.
The goal of these documents is in part to improve findability of
information about species.
The hope is that they will also help
Hi Bernard,
I link to Geonames in both my species, observation and location RDF.
At this point in time, the links in the species RDF make up the bulk of the
interlinking.
I am about to update my data, but here is a preview of the linking for each
species RDF (one of 15,863) that will be online
I have updated the GeoSpecies data set.
You can read about it here:
http://about.geospecies.org/
You can browse it here:
http://lod.geospecies.org/
The RDF dump can be obtained here:
Here is the new RDF dump
http://lod.geospecies.org/geospecies.rdf.tar.gz (1,765,790 Triples)
The data set
Hi Daniel,
I am in the process of updating the GeoSpecies data set and have added your
species to the database.
I will send you a note when this new version is live.
In the meantime, you might like to look over these sparql query examples.
http://about.geospecies.org/sparql.xhtml
You should be able to submit the data to GBIF using their xml format.
In my next update your species with author names will be linked to the
GBIF id
DBpedia Resource
NCBI id - get you to bio2rdf resource
and some others like Wikispecies.
I have this done on the development machine, but I still
Here are some example SPARQL queries of the current GeoSpecies Data Set.
They should work on your local triple store or, on the LOD once the new data
set is updated.
Note the difference between
*geospecies:isExpectedIn* (could be expected in area even if unlikely)
and
I have fixed a number of issues and improved LOD linkages for the GeoSpecies
data set.
You can read about it here:
http://about.geospecies.org/
http://about.geospecies.org/You can browse it here:
http://lod.geospecies.org/
http://lod.geospecies.org/The RDF dump can be obtained here:
Here is
I have a new version of the GeoSpecies Knowledge Base Dataset at:
http://lod.geospecies.org/
You can download the new data dump at:
http://lod.geospecies.org/geospecies.rdf.tar.tz
It is either in the LOD could or will be soon.
The major differences between this version are:
1) Shorter
I was wondering what the current thinking is on ontologies that tie a
concept or tag to a web page?
I was thinking of creating links between species entities and webpages that
are about that species.
For instance the species entity *Puma concolor v6n7p *represented with this
uri*:*
*
*
to make two predicates?
Thanks!
- Pete
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On 8/5/09 09:14, Toby A Inkster wrote:
On 8 May 2009, at 01:30, Peter DeVries wrote:
With the except of the predicates speciesHasGallery, galleryHasSpecies.
In http
I have been wondering about how to best represent different types of web
pages or rdf resources.
I think it is useful to represent some pages like Wikipedia pages as
subclasses of foaf:document.
This is because I would like to be able to easily query for the Wikipedia
pages for a taxon without
I thought I would try marking up some RDF that links species concepts to a
gallery of photo's of that species.
Kingsley suggested I create links from my photo's to my species concepts
using a photo gallery rdf for each species.
The RDF was done by hand, but I created the uri so that it could be
This paragraph below seems to encapsulate the differences in thinking
between the linkeddata community and
some of the TDWG people on how to best share biodiversity data.
*The notion of a fabric of resources that are individually described,
queried, and resolved may seem unmanageable or like
I was working with OpenLink Data Explorer, and I noticed the following in
the uniprot taxonomy records
See
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http://purl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/7162
rdfs:seeAlso
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aedes
*
Hi Giovanni,
I updated the site and data set. I fixed the sitemap file so it should work
now.
http://species.geospecies.org/sitemap.gz
It mainly shows the rdf data dump location:
http://rdf.geospecies.org/geospecies.rdf.tar.gz
Also you should be able to crawl the data starting with this file:
64 matches
Mail list logo