On 10 Jun 2010, at 17:24, Nathan wrote:
Here's a common example of what I'm referring to, suppose we have a (foaf)
documenthttp://ex.org/bobsmith which includes the following triples:
:me foaf:knows http://example.org/joe_bloggs#me .
http://example.org/joe_bloggs#me a foaf:Person ;
One could put the data behind foaf+ssl, and so identify agents :-)
Henry
On 8 Jun 2010, at 10:03, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Dear all:
The volunteer who is hosting http://openean.kaufkauf.net/id/, a huge set of
GoodRelations product model data, is experiencing a problematic amount of
On 6 Jun 2010, at 19:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
your way of specifying the type of the literal reminds me the recent
discussion started by Henry Story:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Feb/0174.html
following this we could also say:
:me foaf:name [
On 6 Jun 2010, at 22:22, Nathan wrote:
Anything stopping me creating an ex:value which does have a strong meaning
and definition where in usage both of the following express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [ ex:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string ] .
seems to me
Sebastian added the pingback relation to the ontology, and it is working now.
I added a Pingback page to the esw wiki http://esw.w3.org/Pingback
I mention a couple of issues we should look into perhaps.
Henry
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
On 15 Apr 2010, at 22:36, Story Henry
There is the RESTlet framework http://www.restlet.org/
Henry
On 20 May 2010, at 10:49, Angelo Veltens wrote:
Hello,
I am just looking for a framework to do content negotiation in java.
Currently I am checking the HttpServletRequest myself quickdirty. Perhaps
someone can recommend a
for Content Negotiation
Resent-From: Linked Data community public-lod@w3.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 10:08:45 +
On 20/05/2010 11:03, Story Henry wrote:
There is the RESTlet framework http://www.restlet.org/
There's also Jersey [1] and, for a minimalist solution to just the
content
On 3 May 2010, at 09:38, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
Dear all:
Some people think that the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce
(http://purl.org/goodrelations/) is powerful, but complex.
[snip]
Turtle/N3:
=
@prefix foo: http://www.example.com/xyz# .
@prefix gr:
In the early days of Atom, people were speaking of using it to replace e-mail.
This is in fact easy to do, we just need to try it out.
1. The problem.
---
Before explaining the solution, it is important to understand the problem.
Currently Atom works like a public mailing list:
On 3 May 2010, at 21:22, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry wrote:
[snip
2. The Solution
---
2.1 RESTful Identity and Authentication
---
foaf+ssl gives us WebIds, global identifiers tied to a public key, which
allows
one click authentication
On 3 May 2010, at 22:02, Nathan wrote:
All in all:
Sounds feasible and pretty much fully spec'd if going down the atompub
route, perhaps linked data + sparql/sparul/pubsubhubbub is the long term
route but I'm quite sure it would take a bit more work to both implement
and encourage
of this, and to simplify the problem. But the answers
given with SPARQL and OWL should help you
a. understand how to simplify without going wrong
b. understand what is dependent on inference
c. what is dependent on graph selection
On 21 Apr 2010, at 23:05, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry
On 22 Apr 2010, at 09:55, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry wrote:
Sorry for being a bit harsh yesterday evening.
Likewise :)
It is a bit difficult to work out what tools you have access to
and what you don't, and as you can imagine that is going to vary from
one person to the other
without mentioning rdf/xml, in an
intutive
but precise way.
On 21 Apr 2010, at 03:44, Nathan wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Request for a bit of help / clarification - started implementing.. see
in-line from here..
Story Henry wrote:
On 20 Apr 2010, at 21:13, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry
On 21 Apr 2010, at 09:17, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry wrote:
On 21 Apr 2010, at 03:44, Nathan wrote:
[ ✄ ] figured it - finally.. (?)
_:group owl:equivalentClass [
a owl:Restriction ;
owl:hasValue http://example.org/usergroups#group1 ;
owl:onProperty [ owl:inverseOf
On 21 Apr 2010, at 16:58, Joe Presbrey wrote:
Sadly, I'm going to have to implement the above in the short term though
as can't for the life of me see any other way of expressing:
if graph Gx holds the triple group has_member webid .
where Gx is found by dereferencing group
where group
I think it would be nice if you went off to study Semantic Web for
the Working Ontologist before asking any more questions on this group.
Currently it would be like a php person coming to a php group, who
never really even looked at a php grammar, syntax, or got a simple php
program to run. And
On 20 Apr 2010, at 08:47, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Nathan,
That sort of reminds me of something [1] ;)
So, I asked a round a bit [2] and the answer essentially was: go register
one ... fancy doing it together?
The latest document draft-nottingham is here btw
On 20 Apr 2010, at 15:52, Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to propose a few new additions to the ACL Ontology, I won't be
specific on names but will describe each one and the associated need.
The addition of groups - personally I see no need to define a set
ontology for what constitutes a
On 20 Apr 2010, at 21:13, Nathan wrote:
Story Henry wrote:
On 20 Apr 2010, at 15:52, Nathan wrote:
I'd like to propose a few new additions to the ACL Ontology, I won't be
specific on names but will describe each one and the associated need.
The addition of groups - personally I see
On 18 Apr 2010, at 11:18, Dan Brickley wrote:
So - I'm serious. The term 'URI' has never really worked as something
most Web users encounter and understand.
For RDF, SemWeb and linked data efforts, this is a problem as our data
model is built around URIs.
If 'URL' can be brought back
On 17 Apr 2010, at 11:34, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
0. Search engine solution
-
Wait for a search engine to index the web, then ask the search engine
which people are linking to you.
Problems:
- This will tend to be a bit slow, as a search engine optimised
On 17 Apr 2010, at 18:57, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
All,
In a sense, we should be able to crystallize the following via our
Profile Pages:
1. Facebook Wall -- part of Facebook Profile Pages
2. Poke (not the greatest term when you factor in cultural diversity,
but we do grok the nudge
On 16 Apr 2010, at 11:48, Sebastian Tramp wrote:
quote Story Henry (15.4.2010):
I often get asked how one solve the friend request problem on open social
networks that use foaf in the hyperdata way.
Hi Henry,
thank you for your introduction to these different solutions.
As one
Hi,
I often get asked how one solve the friend request problem on open social
networks that use foaf in the hyperdata way.
On the closed social networks when you want to make a friend, you send them a
request which they can accept or refuse. It is easy to set up, because all the
On 7 Apr 2010, at 09:55, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Linked Data can be consumed by a wide variety of different client
applications and libraries. Not all of these will have ready access to
an RDFS or OWL reasoner, e.g. Javascript libraries running within a
browser or mobile devices with limited
at bblfish.net (Story Henry)\nDate: Thu, 11 Mar 2010
20:27:05 +0100\nSubject: [foaf-protocols] [xwiki-devs]
http://webid.myxwiki.org/\nIn-Reply-To:
d61d8c2e-e77e-4856-aec9-764e9ca0a...@bblfish.net\nReferences:
d61d8c2e-e77e-4856-aec9-764e9ca0a...@bblfish.net\nMessage-ID:
5faadd40-416a-43a4-a0fe
On 30 March 2010 15:00, henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote:
On 30 Mar 2010, at 06:16, Peter Ansell wrote:
Not sure if the answers to these questions are widely known but I
haven't been able to answer conclusively them looking through the few
documents that relate to this very new technology.
On 26 Mar 2010, at 15:22, KangHao Lu (Kenny) wrote:
Hi all hi Tom,
Does the Semantic Web Interest Group (or the Linked Data community), as a
foaf:Group or something equivalent, has a WebID(URI)? Sorry but I didn't
check whether this has been brought up.
If it doesn't, I would
On 26 Mar 2010, at 18:59, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
This is how it works:
1. New Users open accounts
2. Edit profile
3. Click a button that makes an X.509 certificate, exports to browser, and
writes to FOAF space
4. Member visits any FOAF+SSL or OpenID space on the Web and never has to
On 22 Feb 2010, at 14:50, Nathan wrote:
Melvin Carvalho wrote:
CC: foaf-protocols
On 22 February 2010 14:40, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
As per the subject, I'm very tempted to store a base64 encoded versions
of my PKCS#12 certificate store file inside my FOAF profile;
On 22 Feb 2010, at 15:07, Nathan wrote:
So I can just chain up multiple public key pairs in my FOAF profile ya?
yes, you just need to tie them to your WebId.
See my foaf, where I have two:
http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card
Henry
perfect - thanks :)
next quick question; expired
On 21 Feb 2010, at 01:38, Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
As the subject line goes - what is the (recommended) rdfs:Class of a
Named Graph? Thus far I can only see:
a: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph
I could dereference this and find it's meaning.
b:
Dan Brickley wrote:
However it did not leave any footprint in the academic literature. We
might ask why. Like much of the work around W3C and tech industry
standards, the artifacts it left behind don't often show up in the
citation databases. A white paper here, a Web-based specification
On 31 Jan 2010, at 17:25, Peter Williams wrote:
Let's build that linq2rdfa driver! It’s the killer app for the semweb, in
Microsoft land.
I agreee. From the Java perspective this is very much what I found too.
When I first learned RDF I was really intrigued about how it related to Object
On 1 Feb 2010, at 15:08, Aldo Bucchi wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Story Henry henry.st...@bblfish.net wrote:
On 31 Jan 2010, at 17:25, Peter Williams wrote:
Let's build that linq2rdfa driver! It’s the killer app for the semweb, in
Microsoft land.
Cool!
This topic
There will be a Social Web Camp in Sun Offices in Santa Clara on
Monday November 2. It's is being hosted by SUN Microsystems and
organized by Henry Story and Daniel Appelquist of Vodafone, co-chair
of the W3C Social Web XG.
Imagine a world where everybody could participate easily in a
On 4 Jun 2009, at 12:18, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 00:54 +0100, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
The general RDF graph has the shape
A: U1 owl:sameAs U1, U2, U3, U4 .
Oh yes, another thing: saying the above, with OWL reasoning in place
is
equivalent to saying:
B: U1 owl:sameAs
On 10 Dec 2008, at 15:43, Toby A Inkster wrote:
Georgi Kobilarov wrote:
1. lengths:
metre, kilometre, centimetre, km^2, etc.
dbpedia:Rhine http://dbpedia.org/ontology/length
1320^^http://dbpedia.org/ontology/kilometre
See:
http://idi.fundacionctic.org/muo/muo-vocab.html
Very thorough
As a matter of interest, would it be possible to develop RDF stores
that optimize the layout of the data by analyzing the queries to the
database? A bit like a Java Just In Time compiler analyses the usage
of the classes in order to decide how to optimize the compilation.
Henry
On 24
Just on first reading I find the syntax to be quite problematic. It
clashes with other well known syntaxes namely Turtle, SPARQL and N3.
The two problems I see is that in those languages square brackets are
used for blank nodes, and { } to delimit graphs.
As an example take the following
41 matches
Mail list logo
