-Original Message-
From: semantic-web-requ...@w3.org [mailto:semantic-web-requ...@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Nathan
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 11:51 PM
To: Michael Schneider
Cc: Linked Data community; semantic-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: An idea I need help with, or told to stop wasting time
Hi Henry!
Story Henry wrote:
If you look at the rdf semantics document it spends a lot of time
showing how one can turn literals into bnodes. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-
mt/
(I can't quite remember where now)
This works for OWL (1/2) /Full/ as well. OWL Full uses the (unrestricted)
RDF abstract
All,
My brains breaking over this one - can see it and can't quite flesh out
the details (or figure out if it's worth it) - it's very much a marmite
(love/hate) idea that I haven't fully formed, and is targeted at
addressing some common problems with namedgraph, reification, provenance
On 6 Jun 2010, at 17:17, Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
I have good news :-) rdf:value [1]
Damian
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#rdfValue
Damian Steer wrote:
On 6 Jun 2010, at 17:17, Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
I have good news :-) rdf:value [1]
Brilliant, I hoped that's what it was for (but lack of documentation led
me astray!)
Great,
Nathan
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
And do some funkier stuff:
:me
ops, accidentally sent too eraly
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
ex:sha_1
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
ops, accidentally sent too eraly
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me
On 6 Jun 2010, at 19:54, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
your way of specifying the type of the literal reminds me the recent
discussion started by Henry Story:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2010Feb/0174.html
following this we could also say:
:me foaf:name [
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
so are we saying that all of these express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [
owl:sameAs 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
] .
this two mean the same
:me foaf:name [
xsd:string 'nathan' .
] .
this should
Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
so are we saying that all of these express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [
rdf:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
] .
I find it hard to communicate using a term that has no
On 6 Jun 2010, at 22:22, Nathan wrote:
Anything stopping me creating an ex:value which does have a strong meaning
and definition where in usage both of the following express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [ ex:value 'nathan'^^xsd:string ] .
seems to me
Hi!
Just a few notes concerning your ideas and OWL DL (I don't know whether this
is important for you or not, but some people might find it relevant):
Nathan wrote:
1: Introduce a 'value' property
Where currently we can say:
:me foaf:name 'nathan' .
I'd propose introducing an ex:value
13 matches
Mail list logo
