Wonderful.
Any PDF version available?
pa
On 06/04/2010 16:10, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi folks,
Ian Davis and I have been working on a catalogue of Linked Data
patterns which we've put on-line as a free book. The work is licensed
under a Creative Commons attribution license.
This is is
On 6 Apr 2010, at 17:10, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Any plans to make this a wiki so other people can contribute or at least
comment?
Ian and I debated this for some time, considering both a blog and a
wiki. My preference was to kick things off with a site/book as we have
done here.
You could
Hi,
2010/4/8 Damian Steer d.st...@bristol.ac.uk:
On 6 Apr 2010, at 17:10, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Any plans to make this a wiki so other people can contribute or at least
comment?
Ian and I debated this for some time, considering both a blog and a
wiki. My preference was to kick things off
Hi,
On 6 April 2010 20:46:21 UTC+1, François Scharffe
francois.schar...@inria.fr wrote:
Hi,
OntologyDesignPatterns.org is indeed the place to discuss ontology
patterns. It's also good to know which patterns are useful in practice,
and linked-data vocab patterns are used in vocabs that are
Hi,
Have changed the subject line to clarify the discussion.
On 7 April 2010 00:14:15 UTC+1, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Annotation publishing pattern section there is the following statement:
It is entirely consistent with the Linked Data principles to make
statements
Interesting exchange
Following Ian here to say that quads are not necessary. There are some
workarounds coming to mind.
Any linked data consumer can at any moment dereference the URI to sort out
the original (aka authoritative) description triples from those asserted by
some other source.
When
Hi folks,
Ian Davis and I have been working on a catalogue of Linked Data
patterns which we've put on-line as a free book. The work is licensed
under a Creative Commons attribution license.
This is is still a very early draft but already contains 30 patterns
covering identifiers, modelling,
Hi Leigh,
On 06/04/2010 16:10, Leigh Dodds wrote:
Hi folks,
Ian Davis and I have been working on a catalogue of Linked Data
patterns which we've put on-line as a free book. The work is licensed
under a Creative Commons attribution license.
This is is still a very early draft but already
Hi,
On 6 April 2010 16:56, Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
..
http://patterns.dataincubator.org
More background at [1]. We'd be interested to hear your comments, and
hope that it can become a useful resource for the growing community of
practitioners.
Looks like a
Hi,
OntologyDesignPatterns.org is indeed the place to discuss ontology
patterns. It's also good to know which patterns are useful in practice,
and linked-data vocab patterns are used in vocabs that are themselves
effectively used to describe data. The known uses field is actually
empty for
In the Annotation publishing pattern section there is the following statement:
It is entirely consistent with the Linked Data principles to make
statements about third-party resources.
I don't believe that to be true, simply because, unless users are
always using a quad model (RDF+NamedGraphs),
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Annotation publishing pattern section there is the following statement:
It is entirely consistent with the Linked Data principles to make
statements about third-party resources.
I don't believe that to be
On 7 April 2010 09:31, Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
In the Annotation publishing pattern section there is the following
statement:
It is entirely consistent with the Linked Data principles to make
statements
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your perspective--this problem is something I haven't
considered before. But let me bring up a question.
Suppose we have the resource (URI) X, which is the original resource
that the annotations are all about. Someone comes around and publishes
an annotation about X, using a
On 7 April 2010 10:31, Vasiliy Faronov vfaro...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thanks for your perspective--this problem is something I haven't
considered before. But let me bring up a question.
Suppose we have the resource (URI) X, which is the original resource
that the annotations are all
15 matches
Mail list logo
