On Nov 9, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Hi Paul,
On 9 Nov 2012, at 15:44, Paul Gearon wrote:
Triples don't belong to a graph per se, but in general it's fine for the
same triple to appear in more than one graph.
True.
The exception to this is for those triples that
Sorry all i might be missing a lot of subtleties
are we saying that in the current specs and implementation one can
alter the content of graph B by messing with some triples on a graph A
(one with a blank node?)
Pat i dont get the 'case where subsets of a single large graph are
being
Hi Paul,
On 9 Nov 2012, at 15:44, Paul Gearon wrote:
Triples don't belong to a graph per se, but in general it's fine for the
same triple to appear in more than one graph.
True.
The exception to this is for those triples that contain a blank node. In that
case it may be possible to have
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Richard Cyganiak rich...@cyganiak.dewrote:
On 9 Nov 2012, at 15:44, Paul Gearon wrote:
The exception to this is for those triples that contain a blank node. In
that case it may be possible to have equivalent triples in different
graphs, but not the same
