Re: GoodRelations vs. Google RDFa vs. Open Graph vs. hProduct/hListing: Using GoodRelations in 10 Triples

FYI - This may also be of interest for anybody of you working on linked data for e-commerce. Best Martin Hepp Original Message Subject: More examples of modeling price information with GoodRelations Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:47:48 +0200 From: Martin Hepp (UniBW)

Re: GoodRelations vs. Google RDFa vs. Open Graph vs. hProduct/hListing: Using GoodRelations in 10 Triples

Hi Henry, Thanks for your feedback! >I wonder if the following could make it even simpler though: First I think, why not make the currency a literal? foo:offering a gr:Offering; rdfs:label "Volkswagen Station Wagon, 4WD, 400 $"@en; rdfs:description "I sell my old Volkswagen Station Wago

Re: GoodRelations vs. Google RDFa vs. Open Graph vs. hProduct/hListing: Using GoodRelations in 10 Triples

On 3 May 2010, at 09:38, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote: > Dear all: > > Some people think that the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce > (http://purl.org/goodrelations/) is powerful, but complex. > [snip] > Turtle/N3: > = > @prefix foo: . > @prefix gr:

Re: GoodRelations vs. Google RDFa vs. Open Graph vs. hProduct/hListing: Using GoodRelations in 10 Triples

Apologies - There were a few minor bugs in the initial markup: - I forgot the business function. - The datatype for the price was xsd:string instead of xsd:float. - The legal name had no language tag. The correct examples are at http://ebusiness-unibw.org/pipermail/goodrelations/2010-May/000215.

GoodRelations vs. Google RDFa vs. Open Graph vs. hProduct/hListing: Using GoodRelations in 10 Triples

Dear all: Some people think that the GoodRelations ontology for e-commerce (http://purl.org/goodrelations/) is powerful, but complex. I think it is important for everybody in the community to know that GoodRelations can be as simple (or simpler) than any more lightweight approach for product m