The only problem I see with the example is that we don't have counties
in Scotland, we have districts. In Quebec and Louisiana and other
historically catholic places we have parishes. Is Scotland a state
in the American sense, not really. You could use things like vc:county
and vc:state and
:-)
I've just been forcing 5 different location addresses for one company
(BAE Systems) into VCard. In the process, I have asserted that both
Filton and Samlesbury Aerodrome are street addresses.
TGIF.
Phil.
On 07/01/2011 15:50, John Goodwin wrote:
The only problem I see with the
I'm doing a bit of grunt work on some data about companies and want to
remodel relevant sections using the org vocabulary [1]. But... I'd
rather not be forced to use vCard for the address info (because UK
addresses don't fit the vCard model particularly well. You can make them
fit, but it's a
Hi Phil,
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:32 +, Phil Archer wrote:
I'm doing a bit of grunt work on some data about companies and want to
remodel relevant sections using the org vocabulary [1]. But... I'd
rather not be forced to use vCard for the address info (because UK
addresses don't fit
* [2011-01-04 11:49:43 +] Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com écrit:
] Is VCard that bad? It fits your example below just fine.
The only problem I see with the example is that we don't have counties
in Scotland, we have districts. In Quebec and Louisiana and other
historically catholic
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:49:43 -, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phil,
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:32 +, Phil Archer wrote:
I'm doing a bit of grunt work on some data about companies and want to
remodel relevant sections using the org vocabulary [1]. But... I'd
rather
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 13:28 +0100, William Waites wrote:
* [2011-01-04 11:49:43 +] Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@gmail.com écrit:
] Is VCard that bad? It fits your example below just fine.
The only problem I see with the example is that we don't have counties
in Scotland, we have
Thanks everyone for the replies. OK, I'm going to try and use vCard like
it says!
Dave R - thanks for the example of one location having 2 addresses. I
thought that such a thing might be possible but couldn't think of an
example. I was thinking about shared office space but that didn't lead
I wish the conflation of a VCard and a SocialEntity whose card it is were
either ruled out completely or asserted completely by statements in the
ontology.
I personally find that the class of business card is one which I do not
want to have any data about. (In fact for me it maps best
not to a
Hi Phil,
My inclination is to simply use VCard as is (including the
sub-resources) rather than try to short cut by collapsing the VCard and
Address. So I'd tend to write your example as:
blah a org:Site;
org:siteAddress blah/vcard .
blah/vcard a v:VCard ;
v:fn Blah Ltd (Headquarters);
Thanks Dave,
I'll use this, although, as you say, it's because of the re-use issue.
VCard seems to have many of the problems that TimBL points to. And it
does seem that encoding names and addresses in RDF is a recurring
problem that has yet to be solved to everyone's satisfaction. Ah well...
On 04/01/11 11:49, Dave Reynolds wrote:
The separation between the Site and the address isn't necessary in
general, but it is necessary in order to reuse vcard. An org:Site isn't
a vcard:Address [*] hence the need for the indirection.
I think there's some confusion between the vCard and the
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 11:02 -0500, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
I wish the conflation of a VCard and a SocialEntity whose card it is
were
either ruled out completely or asserted completely by statements in
the ontology.
+1
I personally find that the class of business card is one which I do
not
Hi,
Am 04.01.2011 13:38, schrieb Alexander Dutton:
The vCard ontology doesn't give a general property for linking a thing
to its v:VCard, which suggests to me that the only way to discover
addresses in the general case is when properties in the vCard namespace
are applied directly to people,
14 matches
Mail list logo
