On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 22:27 +0100, William Waites wrote:
On 10-06-03 16:04, Dave Reynolds wrote:
It would be great if you could suggest a better phrasing of the
description of a FormalOrganization that would better encompass the
range of entities you think should go there? Or are you
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 01:03 +0300, Emmanouil Batsis (Manos) wrote:
Sorry for jumping in. I was thinking that
a) the way i get FormalOrganization, it could as well be called
LegalEntity to be more precise.
Not quite, there are other LegalEntities that are not Organizations.
The LegalEntity
community; William Waites; Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
*Subject:* Re: Organization ontology
Large corporations often have multiple legal entities and many
informal, somewhat overlapping business organizations. Just saying. I
wrangled with that. There're several different use cases for these for
internal
: public-egov-ig-requ...@w3.org
[mailto:public-egov-ig-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dave Reynolds
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 11:27 AM
To: Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
Cc: Linked Data community; public-egov...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 01:03 +0300, Emmanouil Batsis
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Kingsley Idehen kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
Peristeras, Vassilios wrote:
Hello all,
I have the feeling that we are (at least partly) reinventing the wheel
here. There have been several initiatives drafting generic models and
representations for
All,
I personally am not aware of what the latest status of the Enterprise
Ontology is. I would not assume that Last modified: Monday, 31 May 2010
means anything significant happened recently.
I originally encoded the Enterprise Ontology into Ontolingua syntax, and
there might have been a
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
Congratulations on the publication of this ontology! I've added it to
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 09:34 +0100, Ian Davis wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
On 06/08/2010 12:27 AM, William Waites wrote:
On 10-06-03 16:04, Dave Reynolds wrote:
It would be great if you could suggest a better phrasing of the
description of a FormalOrganization that would better encompass the
range of entities you think should go there? Or are you advocating that
the
I can see Manos' point. It seems that LegalEntity rather the Organization
would work well under a sub-domain such as .LAW or .DOJ or .SEC, but under
other sub-domains such as .NASA, the Organization element might be better
served as ProjectName. All instances would help specify the
7, 2010 4:50:03 PM
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
Large corporations often have multiple legal entities and many informal,
somewhat overlapping business organizations. Just saying. I wrangled with that.
There're several different use cases for these for internal vs external,
customer
To: Mike Norton
Cc: public-egov...@w3.org; Dave Reynolds; William Waites; Linked Data
community; William Waites; Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
Large corporations often have multiple legal entities and many informal,
somewhat overlapping business organizations. Just
Reynolds; Linked Data community; public-egov...@w3.org
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
On 06/08/2010 12:27 AM, William Waites wrote:
On 10-06-03 16:04, Dave Reynolds wrote:
It would be great if you could suggest a better phrasing of the
description of a FormalOrganization that would better
To: Todd Vincent
Cc: Patrick Logan; public-egov...@w3.org; Dave Reynolds; William Waites; Linked
Data community; William Waites; Emmanouil Batsis (Manos)
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
Thanks for this, Todd. Personally, I love the persons on a beach scenario,
because it is provocative
]
http://www.epimorphics.com/web/category/category/developers/organization-ontology
[3] http://www.w3.org/ns/org# (available in RDF/XML, N3, Turtle via
conneg or append .rdf/.n3/.ttl)
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:06 +1200, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:06 +1200, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com
On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
ontologies, I'd go find one that declares class hierarchies with terms
like 'Terrorist' without giving any operational
Is any sample instance data available, whether it's using real or fake
organizations?
thanks,
Bob
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:29 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
Is any sample instance data available, whether it's using real or fake
organizations?
Not yet, but there will be.
Dave
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:07 PM, William Waites william.wai...@okfn.org wrote:
On 10-06-03 09:01, Dan Brickley wrote:
I don't find anything particularly troublesome about the org: vocab on
this front. If you really want to critique culturally-loaded
ontologies, I'd go find one that declares
-class or equivalent-class of org:Membership.
Dave
[1]
http://www.epimorphics.com/web/wiki/organization-ontology-first-draft
[2] http://www.epimorphics.com/web/wiki/organization-ontology-survey
Weren't these details of the discussion the sort of Mission Creep the org
vocabulary meant to avoid ? Certainly NGO's including Commercial Interests
would like nothing better than to ride the trustworthiness coattails of a
Geo-Political State. But the State is trustworthy precisely because it
Dave,
Does this mean that no sample data has been created yet, or that samples
used in the course of development are not data that you are free to share?
thanks,
Bob
Dave Reynolds wrote:
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 09:29 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
Is any sample instance data available,
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 12:41 -0400, Bob DuCharme wrote:
Dave,
Does this mean that no sample data has been created yet, or that
samples used in the course of development are not data that you are
free to share?
Given the rather ... short ... timescale we were working under the
sketchy
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 17:06 +1200, Stuart A. Yeates wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
This
To give some different perspective, I don't believe that any of those
issues w/r/t to other governance models impinge on the quality or
utility of this organization ontology whatever. Does it accurately
depict every possible scenario? Not at all. Is it adequate for the use
cases and requirements
) will be
announced to these lists. We suggest that any discussion take place on
the public-lod list to avoid further cross-posting.
Dave, Jeni, John
[1] http://www.epimorphics.com/public/vocabulary/org.html
[2]
http://www.epimorphics.com/web/category/category/developers/organization-ontology
[3] http
, Europe
Tel. +353 91 495730
http://linkeddata.deri.ie/
http://sw-app.org/about.html
From: Dave Reynolds dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:50:32 +0100
To: Linked Data community public-lod@w3.org, public-egov...@w3.org
public-egov...@w3.org
Subject: Organization ontology
the Organisation stuff, but this is much better!
Great work,
Nathan
Dave, Jeni, John
[1] http://www.epimorphics.com/public/vocabulary/org.html
[2]
http://www.epimorphics.com/web/category/category/developers/organization-ontology
[3] http://www.w3.org/ns/org# (available in RDF/XML, N3, Turtle
On 06/01/2010 10:26 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/10 08:50, Dave Reynolds wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Looks good Dave.
This is fairly close to AIISO [1], which I'm using
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:26 +0100, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 11:04 +0200, Christophe Guéret wrote:
On 06/01/2010 10:26 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Brilliant! I
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 10:37 +0100, Damian Steer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/10 08:50, Dave Reynolds wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
/developers/organization-ontology
[3] http://www.w3.org/ns/org# (available in RDF/XML, N3, Turtle via conneg
or append .rdf/.n3/.ttl)
--
Bernard Vatant
Senior Consultant
Vocabulary Data Engineering
Tel: +33 (0) 971 488 459
Mail: bernard.vat...@mondeca.com
,
Dave
[1]
http://www.epimorphics.com/web/wiki/organization-ontology-second-draft#comment-60
Dave Reynolds schrieb:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government
organizations.
Great! This comes in due time :-) I was just looking for something like
that. I'll take a deeper look at it.
Kind regards,
Angelo
Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Dave,
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of organizational structures including government organizations.
Brilliant! I submitted it now to Sindice [1] and 'registered' the org prefix
in prefix.cc [2] - you might want to
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for description of
organizational structures including government organizations.
This was motivated by the needs of the data.gov.uk project. After some
Good point!
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2010, at 15:06, Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description of
organizational structures
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
Good point!
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2010, at 15:06, Stuart A. Yeates syea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Dave Reynolds
dave.e.reyno...@googlemail.com wrote:
We would like to announce the availability of an ontology for
description
-egov...@w3.org public-egov...@w3.org
Sent: Tue, June 1, 2010 10:49:57 PM
Subject: Re: Organization ontology
Cool! Let me know when that's ready. End of the week ok? ;P lol
Sent from my iPhone
On 02/06/2010, at 15:47, Mike Norton xsideofparad...@yahoo.com wrote:
Or, in the U.S. we could just
43 matches
Mail list logo
