vocabularies. SWEET ontologies don't seem used in
any VOAF vocabulary or CKAN package I've met so far. And the homepage has
not even a contact email to cc this message :(
I've heard that NASA uses those ontologies internally, but could not find
any pointer to that kind of use.
This is really a sad
to address above issues
From: public-lod-requ...@w3.org [mailto:public-lod-requ...@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Bernard Vatant
Sent: Friday, January 21, 2011 2:14 PM
To: Linking Open Data
Subject: SWEET (but not friendly) ontologies
Hello all
Gathering vocabularies for the growing VOAF dataset [1
ontologies for Earth and
Environment sciences, but neither relying on any external namespace, nor
bearing any kind of metadata (creator, date, publisher, rights ...) to
which we are used in friendly vocabularies. SWEET ontologies don't
seem used in any VOAF vocabulary or CKAN package I've met so far
, but neither relying on any external namespace, nor
bearing any kind of metadata (creator, date, publisher, rights ...) to
which we are used in friendly vocabularies. SWEET ontologies don't
seem used in any VOAF vocabulary or CKAN package I've met so far. And
the homepage has not even a contact email to cc
...) to
which we are used in friendly vocabularies. SWEET ontologies don't
seem used in any VOAF vocabulary or CKAN package I've met so far. And
the homepage has not even a contact email to cc this message :(
I've heard that NASA uses those ontologies internally, but could not
find any pointer
, nor
bearing any kind of metadata (creator, date, publisher, rights ...) to
which we are used in friendly vocabularies. SWEET ontologies don't
seem used in any VOAF vocabulary or CKAN package I've met so far. And
the homepage has not even a contact email to cc this message :(
I've heard that NASA
