Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
So
Yes Sig.ma heavily checks for properties that are subclass of label
and uses them.
I think sparallax as well.
Gio
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf
Hi Dan
For the record what happened to geonames ontology re. this issue
Answering to the first publication of geonames ontology in october 2006, Tim
Berners-Lee himself asked for the geonames:name attribute to be declared
as a subproperty of rdfs:label to make Tabulator able to use it. And in
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:08:36 +0100
Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
DL is a tiresome bore. Add a few more
Dear Dan,
On 2010/11/12, at 20:08, Dan Brickley wrote:
Dear all,
The FOAF RDFS/OWL document currently includes the triple
foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label .
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since
This is one of several things that OWL DL oriented tools (eg.
http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator) don't seem to like, since it
mixes application schemas with the W3C builtins.
FWIW, the footer on the page of the tool mentioned
[[
© University of Manchester, 2003, © University of
Unfortunately, they should complain. OWL defines rdfs:label as an
annotation property, but foaf:name is a datatype property.
If foaf decided to make foaf:name an annotation property too, then it
would be possible to assert that, and even to retain the domain and
range assertions.
While they
