Hi all
Something I don't understand. If I read well all savvy discussions so far,
publishers behind http://schema.org URIs are unlikely to ever provide any
RDF description, so why are those URIs declared as identifiers of RDFS
classes in the http://schema.rdfs.org/all.rdf. For all I can see,
Something I don't understand. If I read well all savvy discussions
so far, publishers behind http://schema.org URIs are unlikely to
ever provide any RDF description,
What makes you so sure about that not one day in the (near?) future
the Schema.org URIs will serve RDF or JSON, FWIW,
Hi Michael
I just repeated what some people-who-know-better around assumed ...
For myself I'm sure of nothing, in particular regarding the future :)
And that's exactly why seems to me that assertions published today should
not preempt (possible) semantics of tomorrow, but rely on semantics as
If I've understood correctly http://schema.org/Person does not in any
way equal or equiv to foaf:person
Surely:
?foo a http://schema.org/Person .
is actually saying
?foo foaf:primary_topic ?person .
?person a foaf:Person .
I've said before that there's value in predicates which relate the
On 6/7/11 6:10 AM, Daniel Schwabe wrote:
In today's iCloud announcement, Apple mentioned that it will offer key-value
storage, and access through an iCloud API. I wonder how RDF will fit into
this...
Any ideas/info? Has anybody looked at the API?
Daniel,
Once the API is released, like
On 6/7/11 8:44 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Hi all
Something I don't understand. If I read well all savvy discussions so
far, publishers behind http://schema.org URIs are unlikely to ever
provide any RDF description, so why are those URIs declared as
identifiers of RDFS classes in the
Kingsley, you lost me once again :(
From the URI you provide I follow my nose to
http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FPerson%23this
Which as it says provides a description of the resource identified by
http://schema.org/Person#this, including the following triple :
On 6/7/11 11:26 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Kingsley, you lost me once again :(
From the URI you provide I follow my nose to
http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FPerson%23this
Which as it says provides a description of the resource identified by
On 6/7/11 11:37 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
On 6/7/11 11:26 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
Kingsley, you lost me once again :(
From the URI you provide I follow my nose to
http://uriburner.com/describe/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fschema.org%2FPerson%23this
Which as it says provides a description of the
*Indian-Summer School on Linked Data*
Leipzig, Sep 12-18, 2011
http://lod2.eu/ISSLOD
ISSLOD takes place in late summer with hopefully still a lot of Indian
Summer (i.e. Altweibersommer / Бабье лето) sunshine rays.
The Linked Data methodology is a
Would it be reasonable to use http://schema.rdfs.org rather than
http://schema.org in the URIs? Essentially mirror what one might hope
for schema.org to become. Then if it does become that, link the two
together?
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Michael Hausenblas
michael.hausenb...@deri.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
