Call for Papers - Semantic Cities at AAAI 2012 - Extended Deadline

2012-04-03 Thread Freddy Lecue
Apologies for cross-postings. Call for Papers: The AAAI 2012 Workshop on Semantic Cities Toronto, Ontario, Canada; July 22-26, 2012 http://research.ihost.com/semanticcities12/index.html Description: Cities around the world aspire to provide superior quality of life to their citizens. An

Re: NIR SIDETRACK Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

2012-04-03 Thread Michael Brunnbauer
Hello Jonathan, On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 05:05:10PM +0200, Jonathan A Rees wrote: Hmm... so from a 200 statuscode and HR14, I can conclude that I have a representation of it, that is is an IR and therefor has a representation that conveys the essential characteristics of it (definition of

Re: NIR SIDETRACK Re: Change Proposal for HttpRange-14

2012-04-03 Thread Michael Brunnbauer
Hello Jonathan, On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 02:05:29PM +0200, Michael Brunnbauer wrote: I thought current representation of in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/uddp-20120229/ refers to something more like 2) and definitely not to mere descriptions but when I look at it there seems to be nothing

NISO/DCMI Webinar with Dan Brickley: Schema.org and Linked Data

2012-04-03 Thread DCMI Announce
***Please excuse the cross-posting*** === NISO/DCMI Webinar: Schema.org and Linked Data: Complementary Approaches to Publishing Data PRESENTER: Dan Brickley DATE: April 25, 2012 TIME: 1:00pm - 2:30pm Eastern (17:00-18:30 UTC)

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread David Booth
On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:33 +0100, Phil Archer wrote: [ . . . ] The actual URI for it is http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=36266 (or rather, that's the page about the spec but that's a side issue for now). That URI is just horrible and

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Phil Archer
Hi David, Yes, one could use URL shorteners and that's probably the only sane way to go but it's still not ideal because: 1. Both Bitly and Tinyurl come with no guarantee of service (and a lot of tracking) - Google's goo.gl is all wrapped up with their services too - not the kind of thing

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Phil Archer
On 03/04/2012 15:53, John Erickson wrote: On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:38 AM, David Boothda...@dbooth.org wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 14:33 +0100, Phil Archer wrote: [ . . . ] The actual URI for it is http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=36266 (or

RE: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Andy Turner
I am a researcher working on some Demographic Social Simulation Models. In the simple models, I distinguish people classed male at birth and people classed female at birth and gender ambiguity, reassignment (sex change) and gender recalssification are not modelled. In more complicated models

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Bill Roberts
The ideal thing would be if ISO, Eurostat produced concise resolvable URIs of course. But while we wait for them to do that, why doesn't W3C mint and support URIs for the most commonly used code lists, that resolve to relevant documentation and/or links to the definitive documents from ISO etc.

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread David Booth
Okay, then maybe a PURL would help? purl.org now supports partial redirects: http://purl.org/docs/faq.html#toc1.9 That may not quite work with your ISO URIs though. Personally, I don't think you should worry too much about a machine expecting to be able to dereference the datatype URI to get

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Gannon Dick
There are just some things outside of the Web's bailiwick, and the properties of people in that class.  The problem is that you are never sure if you are naming the property on rudely calling the property holder names.  ISO declines to play, the LOC declines differently

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread John Erickson
Gannon raises a valid point, BUT it is important to remember that ISO is a *publisher* and DOI is fundamentally a publishing industry thing. So while they might not be inclined to support Cool URIs for their own sake, they might be DOI adopters for the sake of The Bottom Line... On Tue, Apr 3,

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread John Erickson
So David's solution (using PURLs) provides a bit of transparency and manageablity, but it has the disadvantage of having no official status. Maybe (probably) I'm missing something here? On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 11:19 AM, David Booth da...@dbooth.org wrote: Okay, then maybe a PURL would help?  

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread M. Scott Marshall
As Bill suggests: If you use a URI from an authoritative source that serves the terms, you don't have to wait for ISO to start doing it themselves. This has been done to some extent in several efforts in the bio area, in chronological order: http://bio2rdf.org/ A framework of federated PURLs was

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Gannon Dick
If it helps, gender would be a subclass of http://purl.org/pii/terms/marks  If you show me where to point, I'll create the PURL's. It may take me an hour to remember my passwords :o) From: John Erickson olyerick...@gmail.com To: David Booth da...@dbooth.org

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Sarven Capadisli
On 12-04-03 02:33 PM, Phil Archer wrote: I'm hoping for a bit of advice and rather than talk in the usual generic terms I'll use the actual example I'm working on. I want to define the best way to record a person's sex (this is related to the W3C GLD WG's forthcoming spec on describing a Person

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Phil Archer
Again, thanks everyone for the quick and useful responses. @Gannon, @Andy - you are right that the issue of sex/gender is far from straightforward (they're not even the same thing I've learned!) However, I need to offer 'something' even if it's not ideal and then work on the longer term.

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Gannon Dick
Not so fast, young man ... The general point is indeed a minefield.  see also: http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/cnpii.xml  (Common Names of Personally Identifiable Information) I think, but I doubt anyone else in the universe does, that you can fix the problem by looking at RDF Lists a bit

ANN: LDIF - Linked Data Integration Framework Version 0.5 'Quality and Fusion' released.

2012-04-03 Thread Andreas Schultz
Hi all, the Web-based Systems Group and our industry partner mes |semantics are happy to announce the release of the LDIF – Linked Data Integration Framework Version 0.5 'Quality and Fusion'. LDIF can be used within Linked Data applications to translate heterogeneous data from the Web of

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Gannon Dick
oops. http://www.rustprivacy.org/2011/pii/cnpii.xml From: Gannon Dick gannon_d...@yahoo.com To: Phil Archer ph...@w3.org; public-lod@w3.org public-lod@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, April 3, 2012 11:46 AM Subject: Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI Not so fast, young

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Dave Reynolds
On 03/04/12 16:38, Sarven Capadisli wrote: On 12-04-03 02:33 PM, Phil Archer wrote: I'm hoping for a bit of advice and rather than talk in the usual generic terms I'll use the actual example I'm working on. I want to define the best way to record a person's sex (this is related to the W3C GLD

Re: Datatypes with no (cool) URI

2012-04-03 Thread Kerstin Forsberg
For a comprehensive overview of gender vs sex and other challenges in representing the reality underlying demographic data see this paper http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-833/paper20.pdf Describing the The Ontology of Medically Related Social Entitie (OMRSE) http://code.google.com/p/omrse/ . The URI for

[CFP] 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence meets the Web of Data (AImWD-2012)

2012-04-03 Thread Christophe Guéret
Apologies for cross-posting Please, acknowledge this message to your colleagues -- CALL FOR PAPERS 1st International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence meets the Web of Data (AImWD-2012) co-located with

Re: From Open Database Connectivity to Open Data Connectivity

2012-04-03 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 3/30/12 5:47 PM, Barry Norton wrote: On 30/03/2012 22:37, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 3/30/12 5:08 PM, Barry Norton wrote: I'd like to see something like saves you from having to re-invent keys. Linked Data does just that. Precisely. But I wouldn't (with my old ODBC developer hat on) have

Re: Proposal to amend the httpRange-14 resolution

2012-04-03 Thread David Booth
Hi Kingsley, On Tue, 2012-04-03 at 15:01 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote: On 4/3/12 1:46 PM, David Booth wrote: [ . . . ] This use of URI definitions helps to anchor the meaning of the URI, so that it does not drift uncontrollably. [ . . . ] But once on the Web the user really [loses]