Hi, Sergey --
* Sergey Chernyshev [2008/04/02 08:45 AM -0500] wrote:
> It's also interesting how papers are different from presentations
It seems to me that the Bibliographic Ontology [1] should handle
the distinction you mention here.
If the existing terms [2] aren't sufficient, you may be abl
sorry if this post seems hopelessly naive, but...
some questions/thoughts about imdb, if you'll indulge me?
1) the licensing seems too restrictive for the purposes of this community, but
has anyone taken the downloadable imdb data and tried to RDF-ize it? thoughts?
http://www.imdb.com/interf
Hausenblas, Michael wrote:
I second Yves. Let's all come together at #swig channel with a bunch of bright people, nice discussions, and smart bots around ;)
Of course re. the technical stuff. But I sense this request might have
more to do with a realtime discussion space for non technical m
I second Yves. Let's all come together at #swig channel with a bunch of bright
people, nice discussions, and smart bots around ;)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Hausenblas, MSc.
Institute of Information Systems & Information Management
Mark Diggory wrote:
Theres an IRC server at w3.org. Is there any interest in starting a
chat room for discussing LoD?
-Mark
~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
+1
Hello!
> Theres an IRC server at w3.org. Is there any interest in starting a chat
> room for discussing LoD?
I think there are a lot of us on #swig, on freenode - perhaps better
to not cluster the discussion too much?
Cheers!
y
Theres an IRC server at w3.org. Is there any interest in starting a
chat room for discussing LoD?
-Mark
~
Mark R. Diggory - DSpace Developer and Systems Manager
MIT Libraries, Systems and Technology Services
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Thanks, Richard,
I'll take a look at what OntoWorld.org is doing - last time I check their
site I didn't notice any external vocabulary though.
It's also interesting how papers are different from presentations - I was
even thinking about adding papers as separate class because there is
definitely
OK, it looks like I came across some deep ontology-writing task ;) I'll
definitely keep you posted and hope to have something usable outside of
TechPresentations.
Sergey
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Sergey Chernyshev wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
I came across an interesting blog post listing many open datasets for data
processing:
http://www.datawrangling.com/some-datasets-available-on-the-web.html
It might be an interesting source of potential LOD projects.
Sergey
--
Sergey Chernyshev
http://www.sergeychernyshev.com/
Smallish point:
On 18/03/2008 14:39, "Ivan Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard,
...
>
> - Turtle[2] is a syntactic subset of N3, and it is strictly compatible
Not quite.
Turtle does not permit as liberal use of "," as N3.
I am hoping someone will change it to be so, however:
http://lis
On 1 Apr 2008, at 23:15, Peter Ansell wrote:
One more point... In general I think that any community which relies
on inverse reasoning to determine identity is not Linked Data per
their avoidance of point 1. Even if the FOAF Spec recommends that you
give yourself a URI, if you don't use others
12 matches
Mail list logo
