Re: ArtistData...

2008-11-21 Thread Christopher Stewart
Thanks for the Bucchi-ing... :-P Have fun, Chris On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:01 AM, Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christopher, LinkingOpenData-ed LOL. Why not just create the verb... let's get it LOD'ed or loded. Let's get this database loded. Or, let's LOD this database. (

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Yves Raimond
Hello! I guess I asked the question wrong - the linked open data project currently identifies a specific set of dat resources that are linked together - so thie entity is definable - I didn't mean to ask how big the whole Semantic Web is - I meant how many triples are in this particular

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Giovanni Tummarello
Overall, that's about 17 billion. IMO considering myspace 12 billion triples as part of LOD, is quite a stretch (same with other wrappers) unless they are provided by the entity itself (E.g. i WOULD count in livejournal foaf file on the other hand, ok they're not linked but they're not less

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Yves Raimond
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Giovanni Tummarello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overall, that's about 17 billion. IMO considering myspace 12 billion triples as part of LOD, is quite a stretch (same with other wrappers) unless they are provided by the entity itself (E.g. i WOULD count in

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Kingsley Idehen
David Wood wrote: Sorry to intervene here, but I think Kingsley's suggestion sets up a false dicotomy. REST principles (surely part of everything we stand for :) suggest that the source of RDF doesn't matter as long as a URL returns what we want. Late binding means not having to say you're

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread David Wood
On Nov 21, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: I would frame the question this way: is LOD hub now dense enough for basic demonstrations of Linked Data Web utility to everyday Web users? For example, can we Find stuff on the Web with levels of precision and serendipity erstwhile

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Aldo Bucchi wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yves Raimond wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Giovanni Tummarello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Overall, that's about 17 billion. IMO considering myspace 12 billion

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Kingsley Idehen
David Wood wrote: On Nov 21, 2008, at 5:51 PM, Kingsley Idehen wrote: I would frame the question this way: is LOD hub now dense enough for basic demonstrations of Linked Data Web utility to everyday Web users? For example, can we Find stuff on the Web with levels of precision and

Re: Size matters -- How big is the danged thing

2008-11-21 Thread Juan Sequeda
I can't keep quite either. http://squin.sourceforge.net/ We have been keeping this quite for a while, but we should have a working demo in the next week or so! On 11/21/08, Aldo Bucchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:51 PM, Kingsley Idehen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yves