hello friends,
i am working on some project that needs to take user inputs like what would
be the current population in china and give me back LOD etc URLs that it
can find for the concepts mentioned in the string(eg for wordnet URL for
population and dbpedia population for china). It doesnt
Hello Ravinder,
Have a look at OpenCalais http://www.opencalais.com/
--
Vasiliy Faronov
Dear Ravinder,
maybe would be worth for you to have a look at AlchemyAPI
http://www.alchemyapi.com/
They provide a very neat service that returns a set of URIs (from dbpedia,
freebase, geonames and other...) given a free text string as input.
cheers,
2009/11/8 Vasiliy Faronov
रविंदर ठाकुर (ravinder thakur) wrote:
hello friends,
i am working on some project that needs to take user inputs like what would
be the current population in china and give me back LOD etc URLs that it
can find for the concepts mentioned in the string(eg for wordnet URL for
population
Hi Ying!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:28 AM, ying ding dingy...@indiana.edu wrote:
It is a great work.
Thanks!
for your sparql endpoint, will this support all the CKAN dataset, means all
the LOD bubbles? Then how should I query. Will you provide some sparql
examples in the future.
Yes -
Hi,
It is possibly useful to sound a bit of a warning about the link (sic)
between Linking, Open, Data and RDF.
So the LOD diagram captures some of this stuff, but there is plenty of other
stuff which is in RDF to Linked Data standards, but doesn't appear because
there are not enough links to or
Jonathan Gray wrote:
Hi Ying!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:28 AM, ying ding dingy...@indiana.edu wrote:
It is a great work.
Thanks!
for your sparql endpoint, will this support all the CKAN dataset, means all
the LOD bubbles? Then how should I query. Will you provide some sparql
Hugh Glaser wrote:
Hi,
It is possibly useful to sound a bit of a warning about the link (sic)
between Linking, Open, Data and RDF.
So the LOD diagram captures some of this stuff, but there is plenty of other
stuff which is in RDF to Linked Data standards, but doesn't appear because
there are not
Hi,
I think that if the need for modularization is real, it won't be a
problem to have different prefixes, as these should map to distinct
(hopefully) intuitive partitions of an ontology.
I think some simple trick as choosing less confusing prefixed would
help.
ciao,
Andrea
On 26 Oct
