Re: Ontology Wars? Concerned

2009-11-20 Thread François Scharffe
Hi ! Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: [...] I think we need a Wiki, where people will post what their problem were, what data they needed, what data they had, which ontologies they needed, and what they did to meet these needs. Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices

Re: data.semanticweb.org down?

2009-11-20 Thread Michael Hausenblas
All DERI-hosted services should be up and running now again. Please ping me in case you encounter some unexpected behaviour or you find one of our sites or services not online as expected and please do accept our apologies for any inconvenience caused. Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael

Call for Papers/Workshop Proposals Participantion (GPC-10, UIC-10, MTPP-10, ICA3PP-10, FC-10, SMPE-10, FutureTech-10, BodyNets-10)

2009-11-20 Thread Robert C. Hsu
** Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this announcement. ** Dear Colleague: Please disseminate this message in your networks / subscribed lists. We

Re: Ontology Wars? Concerned

2009-11-20 Thread Kjetil Kjernsmo
On Friday 20. November 2009 09:37:42 François Scharffe wrote: Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices for each problem newcomers present, and provide a launchpad for ventures beyond what's there with minimal cost. Sounds like www.ontologydesignpatterns.org

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Yves Raimond
Hello! Back in April, we had a similar discussion: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2009Apr/0130.html Concretely, we are having exactly the same problem for syncing up aggregations of BBC RDF data (Talis's and OpenLink's), as our data changes *a lot*. Right now, we're thinking

Re: Ontology Wars? Concerned

2009-11-20 Thread Kurt J
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Kjetil Kjernsmo kje...@kjernsmo.net wrote: On Friday 20. November 2009 09:37:42 François Scharffe wrote: Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices for  each problem newcomers present, and provide a launchpad for ventures beyond

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Michael Hausenblas
Georgi, All, I like the discussion, and as it seems to be a recurrent pattern as pointed out by Yves (which might be a sign that we need to invest some more time into it) I've tried to sum up a bit and started a straw-man proposal for a more coarse-grained solution [1]. Looking forward to

Re: Ontology Wars? Concerned

2009-11-20 Thread François Scharffe
Hi Kjetil, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: On Friday 20. November 2009 09:37:42 François Scharffe wrote: Eventually, this will evolve into a reference site with best practices for each problem newcomers present, and provide a launchpad for ventures beyond what's there with minimal cost. Sounds like

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Ed Summers
At the Library of Congress we've been experimenting with using an Atom feed to alert subscribers to new resources available at id.loc.gov [1]. The approach is similar to what Niklas' is doing, although we kind of independently arrived at this approach (which was nice to discover). Creates,

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Jun Zhao
Hi Michael, Michael Hausenblas wrote: Georgi, All, I like the discussion, and as it seems to be a recurrent pattern as pointed out by Yves (which might be a sign that we need to invest some more time into it) I've tried to sum up a bit and started a straw-man proposal for a more coarse-grained

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Ed Summers wrote: At the Library of Congress we've been experimenting with using an Atom feed to alert subscribers to new resources available at id.loc.gov [1]. The approach is similar to what Niklas' is doing, although we kind of independently arrived at this approach (which was nice to

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Nathan
Kingsley Idehen wrote: Ed Summers wrote: At the Library of Congress we've been experimenting with using an Atom feed to alert subscribers to new resources available at id.loc.gov [1]. The approach is similar to what Niklas' is doing, although we kind of independently arrived at this approach

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Ed Summers
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: is this not the same as (or vi similar to) the court approach outlined here: http://code.google.com/p/court/ by Niklas Yes, absolutely. Although I had no idea of Niklas' work at the time. That's why I said: At the Library of

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Kingsley Idehen
Ed Summers wrote: On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote: is this not the same as (or vi similar to) the court approach outlined here: http://code.google.com/p/court/ by Niklas Yes, absolutely. Although I had no idea of Niklas' work at the time. That's why I

RE: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Georgi Kobilarov
Hi Michael, nice write-up on the wiki! But I think the vocabulary you're proposing is too much generally descriptive. Dataset publishers, once offering update feeds, should not only tell that/if their datasets are dynamic, but instead how dynamic they are. Could be very simple by expressing:

Re: RDF Update Feeds + URI time travel on HTTP-level

2009-11-20 Thread Chris Bizer
Hi Michael, Georgi and all, just to complete the list of proposals, here another one from Herbert Van de Sompel from the Open Archives Initiative. Memento: Time Travel for the Web http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.1112 The idea of Memento is to use HTTP content negotiation in the datetime dimension. By

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Hugh Glaser
Sorry if I have missed something, but... We currently put things like changefreqmonthly/changefreq changefreqdaily/changefreq changefreqnever/changefreq in our semantic sitemaps, and these suggestions seem very similar. Eg http://dotac.rkbexplorer.com/sitemap.xml (And I think these frequencies may

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Alexandre Passant
Hi, On 17 Nov 2009, at 15:45, Georgi Kobilarov wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start a discussion about a topic that I think is getting increasingly important: RDF update feeds. The linked data project is starting to move away from releases of large data dumps towards incremental updates. But

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Nathan
Georgi Kobilarov wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start a discussion about a topic that I think is getting increasingly important: RDF update feeds. The linked data project is starting to move away from releases of large data dumps towards incremental updates. But how can services consuming rdf

Re: RDF Update Feeds

2009-11-20 Thread Nathan
Nathan wrote: Georgi Kobilarov wrote: Hi all, I'd like to start a discussion about a topic that I think is getting increasingly important: RDF update feeds. The linked data project is starting to move away from releases of large data dumps towards incremental updates. But how can services