In message 4b605247.6030...@openlinksw.com, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com writes
And that mixing and matching Linked Data, Topic Maps and full-text
XML (etc.) can potentially take us to some exciting new places. (But
then that's hardly news. I remember discussing the value of URNs
Thanks for the pointer.
(Won’t actually look at the ARC code at the moment, as it may be hard to comply
with Benji’s license.)
However, rather than being as clever as possible, somehow I thought I should
respect what the publisher said, so perhaps first Content-Type, then extension,
rather
Hi Hugh,
There is a trace option in rapper.
You can do something like :
jambi:~ mmt$ rapper --trace --guess http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf lame.nt
rapper: Parsing URI http://mmt.me.uk/foaf.rdf with parser guess
rapper: Serializing with serializer ntriples
rapper: Processing URI
Hello Hugh!
Did you try EasyRDF?
http://code.google.com/p/easyrdf/
It was coded by Nicholas Humfrey from the BBC and has quite a lot of
cool features whilst being very lightweight - it also handles
cURL-ing/parsing for you.
Cheers,
y
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Hugh Glaser
Richard Light wrote:
In message 4b605247.6030...@openlinksw.com, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com writes
And that mixing and matching Linked Data, Topic Maps and full-text
XML (etc.) can potentially take us to some exciting new places.
(But then that's hardly news. I remember
Hi Nathan --
You wrote:
*...has anybody found working with RDF particularly easy / well
supported in any languages?*
Here's an approach in which each reasoning step is documented in executable
English:
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/RDFQueryLangComparison1.agent
and here is a paper
Hi all
http://www.idpf.org/2007/opf/OPF_2.0_final_spec.html#AppendixA defines
a Dublin Core-based XML metadata format used for ebooks.
This is very nice but a little disconnected from other Dublin Core
data in RDF. It would be great to have some XSLT to explore closer
integration and use of
Hi Everybody,
After the huge success of the Consuming Linked Data tutorial at ISWC2009, we
are proud to announce that this tutorial has been accepted for WWW2010
conference [1].
If you missed out last time, please join us at WWW2010.
[1] http://www2010.org/www/program/tutorials/
Regards
Juan
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying to
parse the RDF coming from the BBC. If you take a document like:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/72c536dc-7137-4477-a521-567eeb840fa8.rdf
notice how all of the URIs are paths, but there's no xml:base to
declare where these
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying to
parse the RDF coming from the BBC. If you take a document like:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/artists/72c536dc-7137-4477-a521-567eeb840fa8.rdf
notice
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying to
parse the RDF coming from the BBC. If you take a document like:
Thanks, Dan. Simon Spero pointed me towards this as well (so I would
like to publicly thank him, too).
My takeaway is that both parties are doing something wrong here:
1) My parser needs to be aware of the context of the resource it is
parsing (whether that be the URI it is being retrieved from
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Dan Brickley dan...@danbri.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a question about something I've run across when trying
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Dan. Simon Spero pointed me towards this as well (so I would
like to publicly thank him, too).
My takeaway is that both parties are doing something wrong here:
1) My parser needs to be aware of the context of
(Apologies to anyone who gets this message twice; my original message
to the list doesn't seem to have gotten through)
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Nathan,
Does anybody know of any programming languages, released or in
development / patching
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which may be either a relative or absolute path, per
RFC2396 section 5:
relativeURI = ( net_path | abs_path | rel_path ) [ ? query ]).
I've already mentioned refactoring to take into account 5.1.3, but I'm
not
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which may be either a relative or absolute path, per
RFC2396 section 5:
relativeURI = ( net_path | abs_path | rel_path ) [ ? query
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which may be either a relative or absolute path, per
Joshua Shinavier wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
Hi All,
Hi Nathan,
Does anybody know of any programming languages, released or in
development / patching which support for EAV / triples / URIs as
attribute/variable names
Marko mentioned
Yves Raimond wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which may be either a relative or
Nathan wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Yves Raimond yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals with
relative URIs (which
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Yves Raimond wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Yves Raimond
yves.raim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Ross Singer
rossfsin...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is what the spec actually says. xml:base deals
22 matches
Mail list logo