On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 22:50 +0100, Danny Ayers wrote:
On 10 March 2010 18:19, Paul Houle ontolo...@gmail.com wrote:
head xmlns=http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml;
xmlns:dcterms=http://purl.org/dc/terms/;
meta rel=dcterms:creator content=Ataru Morobishi
/head
...
This does bend the
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 12:03 -0500, Paul Houle wrote:
meta rel={predicate} content={object} /
meta rel={predicate} content={object} datatype={type_of_object} /
You want to use @property, not @rel. Also, don't forget @xml:lang!
Am I missing anything?
To bullet-proof it, you may want to
meta about={subject} rel={predicate} content={object} /
link about={subject} rel={predicate} href={object} /
You might also want to add typeof={rdf_type}, it's a nice shortcut to
assert an extra rdf:type triple about the subject. Beware however that this
will create a blank node if no about
On 11/03/2010 11:04, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:24 +, Nathan wrote:
If I have multiple representations of a resource which I consider
equal, let's say one of each of the following: RDF+XML, RDF+N3, SVG
Then should all three representations be considered equivalent?
Pierre-Antoine Champin wrote:
On 11/03/2010 11:04, Toby Inkster wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:24 +, Nathan wrote:
If I have multiple representations of a resource which I consider
equal, let's say one of each of the following: RDF+XML, RDF+N3, SVG
Then should all three representations
