Re: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-07 Thread Henry Story
On 7 Jul 2010, at 04:23, David Booth wrote: On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 20:45 +0200, Henry Story wrote: [ . . . ] foaf:knows a rdf:Property . Well we can dereference foaf:knows to find out what it means. This is the canonical way to find it's meaning, and is the initial procedure we should

Re: RDF and its discontents

2010-07-07 Thread Bob Ferris
Hi Paul, thanks a lot for your very insightful experience report about Semantic Web, RDF and DBPedia. (more thoughts inline) Am 02.07.2010 17:07, schrieb Paul Houle: Here are some of my thoughts [skip] (4) I'm one of the people who got interested in semantic tech because of DBPedia,

Re: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-07 Thread Toby Inkster
On Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:11:19 -0500 Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote: The world doesn't have facts like that in it. Classes and properties are intellectual constructs, not the stuff of reality. Hell, if a particle can be a wave, then surely a class can be a property. Anyway, RDF doesn't make

Re: [ANN] Major update of Lexvo.org

2010-07-07 Thread Bernard Vatant
Hi all Thanks to Gerard for pushing officially Lexvo.org here. Since he mentioned the redirection of lingvoj.org URIs for languages, I think good to provide here a little details about the why and how's of this process as an example of practice, hopefully good, possibly best :) What should you

Re: Subjects as Literals

2010-07-07 Thread Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote: I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on this suggestion: On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer reto.bachm...@trialox.org wrote: ... Serialization formats could support Jo :nameOf

Re: RDF Extensibility

2010-07-07 Thread Jiří Procházka
On 07/06/2010 11:05 PM, Pat Hayes wrote: On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote: [snipped] In case of a) I don't have cleared up my thoughts yet, but generally I would like to know: How are semantic extensions to work together in automated system? Well, the semantics always