On 2/18/15 3:08 PM, Paul Houle wrote:
I am looking at some cases where I have databases that are similar to
Dbpedia and Freebase in character, sometimes that big (ok, those
particular databases), sometimes smaller. Right now there are no
blank nodes, perhaps there are things like the
Hey Paul,
we have the editing interface, but ontologies are not of much help
here. The question is, how and where to draw the boundary of the
description that you want to edit, because millions of triples on one
page will not work.
Fine-grained named graphs and/or SPARQL queries/updates are 2
I am looking at some cases where I have databases that are similar to
Dbpedia and Freebase in character, sometimes that big (ok, those
particular databases), sometimes smaller. Right now there are no blank
nodes, perhaps there are things like the compound value types from
Freebase which are
Why do you assume I assume something?
I simply stated what should be considered. When Paul replies, we'll
know what kind of dataset it is, and whether these issues apply.
He mentions DBPedia as an example, which returns around 20 named
graphs for triples. How are those supposed to be edited?
--
2nd Call For Participation: NoISE 2015
Workshop on Negative or Inconclusive rEsults in Semantic Web
@ESWC2015, Portoroz, Slovenia -
Hi everyone!
My presentations from the Dublin meeting are at
- http://VladimirAlexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/add-mapping-long.html
An example of adding a mapping, while making a couple props along the way and
reporting a couple of problems.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I agree that there are problems with the mappings. However, how can the
mappings be fixed without fixing the ontology?
peter
On 02/18/2015 05:03 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
Hi everyone!
My presentations from the Dublin meeting are at
-
Vladimir,
I am more than happy to work the ML problem with you. For your example of the
dichotomy with the domain and range of mother and queen Victoria being the
mother, this begs for contextual approach to that concept
Aaron
On Feb 18, 2015, at 08:03, Vladimir Alexiev
On 2/18/15 5:07 PM, Martynas Jusevičius wrote:
Why do you assume I assume something?
Because he spoke about an Microsoft-Access-like solution. If you've used
that tool you would know that massive dataset edits, as you indicated,
can't be the focal point of his quest, hence my comment.
I
Well here is my user story.
I am looking at a page that looks like this
http://dbpedia.org/page/Albert_Einstein
it drives me up the wall that the following facts are in there:
:Albert_Einstein
dbpedia-owl:childOf :EinsteinFamily ;
dbpedia-owl:parentOf :EinsteinFamily .
which is just
Paul,
does this look something like the interface you could use?
http://linkeddatahub.com/ldh?mode=http%3A%2F%2Fgraphity.org%2Fgc%23EditMode
Martynas
graphityhq.com
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Paul Houle ontolo...@gmail.com wrote:
Well here is my user story.
I am looking at a page
Hi Paul,
I'm detecting a snippy disturbance in the Linked Open Data Force :)
The text edit problem resides in the nature of SQL type queries vs. SPARQL type
queries. It's not in the data exactly, but rather in the processing
(name:value pairs). To obtain RDF from data in columns you want to
Yes, there is the general project of capturing 100% of critical
information in documents and that is a wider problem than the large amount
of Linked Data which is basically RelationalDatabase++.
Note that a lot of data in this world is in spreadsheets (like relational
tables but often less
Dear all,
The early registration deadline for the Protege Short Course is coming
up next week on Friday, 27 February, 2015!
Register soon, before the rates go up:
http://protege.stanford.edu/shortcourse/201503/registration.html
The Protege Short Course will be held at Stanford University,
14 matches
Mail list logo
