On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Pat Hayes pha...@ihmc.us wrote:
On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:31 AM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Toby Inkster t...@g5n.co.uk wrote:
Without knowing the definition of foaf:Person, it's difficult to
conclude that foaf:Person
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Danny Ayers danny.ay...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been studiously avoiding this rat king of a thread, but just on
this suggestion:
On 2 July 2010 11:16, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer reto.bachm...@trialox.org
wrote:
...
Serialization formats could support
Jo :nameOf
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Hugh Glaser h...@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote:
In fact, a question I would like to ask, but suspect that noone who can
answer it is still reading this thread ( :-) ):
For those who implement RDF stores, do you have to do something special to
reject RDF that has
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
And do some funkier stuff:
:me
ops, accidentally sent too eraly
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
...
:me foaf:name [
ex:value 'nathan' ;
ex:type xsd:string ;
ex:language 'en-gb' .
] .
foaf:name has range rdfs:Literal, this still allows us to say:
:me foaf:name [
ex:sha_1
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Nathan nat...@webr3.org wrote:
so are we saying that all of these express the same:
:me foaf:name 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
:me foaf:name [
owl:sameAs 'nathan'^^xsd:string .
] .
this two mean the same
:me foaf:name [
xsd:string 'nathan' .
] .
this should
I'm wondering what the advantages of grit are when compared with
simple subsets of RDF/XML than can be used for XSLT transformation,
e.g. Morten's R3X [1].
Cheers,
reto
1.
http://www.wasab.dk/morten/blog/archives/2004/05/30/transforming-rdfxml-with-xslt
(just to allow XSLT the special RSS 1.0
