natlu2809 wrote:
Maybe I'm not understanding the dichotomy here:
* A URI represents a thing, or is an address for a thing
URI Identifies a Thing. URIs basically have Referents (the things they
Identify).
A URL is a Resource Location/Address.
* Different things have different URIs
nat lu wrote:
[snip]
The identity however is maintained by the fingerprint of the
object graphs, and the URI is just an image of that fingerprint at
some point in time/location ?
I think Identity is managed by the beholder of things, the one that
deems them important
nat lu wrote:
[snip]
The identity however is maintained by the fingerprint of the
object graphs, and the URI is just an image of that fingerprint
at some point in time/location ?
I think Identity is managed by the beholder of things, the one
that deems them important
Nathan wrote:
nat lu wrote:
[snip]
The identity however is maintained by the fingerprint of the
object graphs, and the URI is just an image of that fingerprint at
some point in time/location ?
I think Identity is managed by the beholder of things, the one
Hi All,
To follow on a conversation I'm having with Kingsley at the minute, and
to make it public, I'm also cc'ing in public-lod, pedantic-web and the
sioc user list, as it is to do with all 3. Please do give feedback and
correct me where I'm wrong. Especially if you can inline comment where
Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
To follow on a conversation I'm having with Kingsley at the minute, and
to make it public, I'm also cc'ing in public-lod, pedantic-web and the
sioc user list, as it is to do with all 3. Please do give feedback and
correct me where I'm wrong. Especially if you can inline
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
To follow on a conversation I'm having with Kingsley at the minute, and
to make it public, I'm also cc'ing in public-lod, pedantic-web and the
sioc user list, as it is to do with all 3. Please do give feedback and
correct me where I'm wrong.
Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
To follow on a conversation I'm having with Kingsley at the minute, and
to make it public, I'm also cc'ing in public-lod, pedantic-web and the
sioc user list, as it is to do with all 3. Please do give feedback and
correct me where
Nathan wrote:
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
To follow on a conversation I'm having with Kingsley at the minute, and
to make it public, I'm also cc'ing in public-lod, pedantic-web and the
sioc user list, as it is to do with all 3. Please do give feedback and
correct me
Nathan wrote:
[SNIP]
perfect, thanks kingsley :)
only q (which i still don't follow) is that afaik I *need* to specify in
rdf where one can find the HTML document, no point describing something
people can't find... noted that in you're own rdf you use:
resource
Kingsley Idehen wrote:
Nathan wrote:
[SNIP]
i think it's safe to say I grok this all now (lod); armed with
everything i need, and full comprehension to do a months work in the
next 4 days!
kingsley, sincerely, thank you for everything - you've been invaluable
in this process and looking
2009/12/1 Hogan, Aidan aidan.ho...@deri.org:
Hi Kingsley,
For the sake of others.
How do you describe and information resource via an RDF graph that is
supposed to play well with Linked Data principles?
If I understand the intent of your question, you are asking how an
information
Peter Ansell wrote:
2009/12/1 Hogan, Aidan aidan.ho...@deri.org:
Hi Kingsley,
For the sake of others.
How do you describe and information resource via an RDF graph that is
supposed to play well with Linked Data principles?
If I understand the intent of your question, you are
I assume you've noticed the dearth of RDF examples that include descriptions
of RDF files that are distinct, but connected, to the file contents.
People have been doing that for years using foaf:primaryTopic. See
example at http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/#term_PersonalProfileDocument
and
Ian Davis wrote:
I assume you've noticed the dearth of RDF examples that include descriptions
of RDF files that are distinct, but connected, to the file contents.
People have been doing that for years using foaf:primaryTopic. See
example at
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
If you lookup Linked Data from spaces associated with myself of OpenLink you
will see use the aforementioned property re. missing relation. Also, you may
also find out that few people added the missing triple to
2009/12/1 Ian Davis li...@iandavis.com:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:37 PM, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
If you lookup Linked Data from spaces associated with myself of OpenLink you
will see use the aforementioned property re. missing relation. Also, you may
also find out
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Peter Ansell ansell.pe...@gmail.com wrote:
The necessary declaration of document as distinct, and yet necessary
for the definition of data, and the necessity of different URI's for
these two concepts, are fundamental sticking points for many people.
Who is
18 matches
Mail list logo
