RE: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-09 Thread Jarred McGinnis
: Stéphane Corlosquet [mailto:scorlosq...@gmail.com] Sent: 08 September 2011 18:07 To: Bernard Vatant Cc: Jarred McGinnis; public-lod@w3.org; Semantic Web Subject: Re: Press.net News Ontology Hi Bernard, On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.com wrote: Hello Stéphane

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Wilton
Hi Steph There is clearly some crossover with rNews. Jarred has a nice diagram showing some of this, and I am sure he will follow up. However we feel with press.net we have gone much further than rNews particularly in acknowledging that news (in the majority of cases) is event driven. While rNews

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Wilton
Hi Bernard Many of the items on Bobs list we have done for good reason either for specialisation of the class, or for contract binding. For example pns:Person inherits from foaf:Person as we wanted to enhance the parent class, and make relationships to other entities in the model, similarly for

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Wilton
Hi Steph There is clearly some crossover with rNews. Jarred has a nice diagram showing some of this, and I am sure he will follow up. However we feel with press.net we have gone much further than rNews particularly in acknowledging that news (in the majority of cases) is event driven. While rNews

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-09 Thread Paul Wilton
Hi Steph There is clearly some crossover with rNews. Jarred has a nice diagram showing some of this, and I am sure he will follow up. However we feel with press.net we have gone much further than rNews particularly in acknowledging that news (in the majority of cases) is event driven. While rNews

Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Jarred McGinnis
Hello all, The Press Association has just published our first draft of a 'news' ontology (http://data.press.net/ontology). For each of the ontologies documented, we've included the motivation for the ontologies as well as some of the design decisions behind it. Also, you can get the rdf or ttl

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 9/8/11 9:48 AM, Jarred McGinnis wrote: Hello all, The Press Association has just published our first draft of a 'news' ontology (_http://data.press.net/ontology_). For each of the ontologies documented, we've included the motivation for the ontologies as well as some of the design

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Stéphane Corlosquet
Hi Jarred, It seems to me that your work is similar or at least related to rNews [1]. I'm curious to know if you're looked at rNews when building the News Ontology. Do they complement each other, or are we re-inventing the wheel? Steph. [1] http://dev.iptc.org/rNews On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 9:48

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Kingsley Idehen
On 9/8/11 11:45 AM, Stéphane Corlosquet wrote: Hi Jarred, It seems to me that your work is similar or at least related to rNews [1]. I'm curious to know if you're looked at rNews when building the News Ontology. Do they complement each other, or are we re-inventing the wheel? Steph. [1]

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Bernard Vatant
Hello Stéphane Any idea when rNews will be available as an RDFS or OWL vocabulary? So far we have at least an URI for it http://dev.iptc.org/rnewsowl but no description :) Bernard 2011/9/8 Stéphane Corlosquet scorlosq...@gmail.com Hi Jarred, It seems to me that your work is similar or at

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Stéphane Corlosquet
Hi Bernard, On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Bernard Vatant bernard.vat...@mondeca.comwrote: Hello Stéphane Any idea when rNews will be available as an RDFS or OWL vocabulary? No idea. I do not represent rNews in any way, but it seems there has been lots of activity around rNews, so I would

Re: Press.net News Ontology

2011-09-08 Thread Bernard Vatant
Adding to Bob's list with which I fully agree In http://data.press.net/ontology/stuff/ the namespace http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/ used for time ontology is not correct. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/Instant is 404. Bing. The time ontology is indeed specified by http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time