On 6 Sep 2009, at 17:06, Dan Brickley wrote:
ps. i am just running MusicBrainz Picard tagger over all my mp3s
(includes all the CDs I ever bought...). ... Is there a tool /
workflow people here can recommend to turn all that into RDF locally?
does picard keep a db somewhere, or all metadata is
Hello All,
It seems there are (too) many options for creating music-related URIs.
They are mostly all based on Musicbrainz.org IDs (which is quite
appropriate), but it can be difficult to know which to choose. I can
identify at least four different sources of artist URIs based on
musicbrainz
Hi Nick,
It is a dilemma indeed. I think we need to make a effort to get RDF/
RDFa on to musicbrainz.org and then we can use the 'proper' URIs. I
have been holding back from doing this because the codebase has been
changing so much - but there is a big new release coming soon
i like
I guess it will be as soon as we actually send them a patch :-) I did
some work on that last year (just rdf/xml) but as nick said, the
codebase has been changing very fast since then... We should gather
efforts once the big scary release is out and make it happen!
Cheers,
Y
On 9/6/09, Kurt J
so those who have responded seem to agree using musicbrainz.org URIs
is the best. so i purpose we encourage the use of these in all future
/ current projects. then after this next mbz release work to inject
RDFa asap.
i think one thing that would really facilitate this is including
sameAs in
Kurt J wrote:
so those who have responded seem to agree using musicbrainz.org URIs
is the best. so i purpose we encourage the use of these in all future
/ current projects. then after this next mbz release work to inject
RDFa asap.
i think one thing that would really facilitate this is
