On 02/22/2010 09:44 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 22 Feb 2010, at 19:36, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to be
- more
On Feb 22, 2010, at 5:51 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote:
On 02/22/2010 05:54 AM, Gregory Williams wrote:
The next draft of the service description document will likely include a
named graph class to go along with the property mentioned above. If the
modeling in the example section[1] works for
On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:47 AM, Jiří Procházka wrote:
On 02/22/2010 09:44 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
On 22 Feb 2010, at 19:36, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for
ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My
Jiri,
On 22 Feb 2010, at 10:51, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to be
- more stable
- more mature
- more likely to be widely
On 02/22/2010 01:53 PM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
Jiri,
On 22 Feb 2010, at 10:51, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to be
On 22 Feb 2010, at 19:36, Jiří Procházka wrote:
I wonder if we as a group of people
interested in Semantic Web could come up with etiquette for ontology
mapping.
Interesting topic! My €0.02: If the other vocabulary is likely to
be
- more stable
- more mature
- more likely to be widely used
On 21 Feb 2010, at 01:38, Nathan wrote:
Hi All,
As the subject line goes - what is the (recommended) rdfs:Class of a
Named Graph? Thus far I can only see:
a: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph
I could dereference this and find it's meaning.
b:
Nathan,
Any further input before I start using rdfg-1:Graph when describing graphs?
I'd suggest you forget about both references and go with the upcoming
SPARQL standard [1].
Cheers,
Michael
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-sparql11-service-description-20100126/#id41744
--
Dr.
What you pointed at is a property sd:namedGraph. The upcoming SPARQL
standard doesn't define any class for named graphs.
I support using: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph
Best,
Jiri
On 02/21/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Nathan,
Any further input before I start using
is the class of a Named Graph?
What you pointed at is a property sd:namedGraph. The upcoming SPARQL
standard doesn't define any class for named graphs.
I support using: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph
Best,
Jiri
On 02/21/2010 10:40 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
Nathan
On Feb 21, 2010, at 5:29 AM, Michael Hausenblas wrote:
What you pointed at is a property sd:namedGraph.
Well spotted! But I didn't really say: here is the class name. I wanted to
point out that there is something relevant, likely be part of an upcoming
standard so one should have it in
Hi All,
As the subject line goes - what is the (recommended) rdfs:Class of a
Named Graph? Thus far I can only see:
a: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/rdfg-1/Graph
b: http://sw.nokia.com/RDFQ-1/Graph
Where [a] is used as the domain of swp:Warrant,Authority etc.
Any further input before I start
12 matches
Mail list logo