Re: How "valid" is to use a term marked as "unstable" for a data publisher/consumer?

2016-07-20 Thread Ghislain Atemezing
Hi Dan, Many thanks for this summary showing the beginning of what we can be proud to contribute as well. Many thanks for all your contributions I have to say. Few comments inline below… > Le 20 juil. 2016 à 12:10, Dan Brickley a écrit : > > +Cc: Leigh Dodds, for old

Re: How "valid" is to use a term marked as "unstable" for a data publisher/consumer?

2016-07-20 Thread Dan Brickley
+Cc: Leigh Dodds, for old time's sake On 20 July 2016 at 09:45, Ghislain Atemezing wrote: > Hi all, > > [ Apologize if this question has been answered before in this group. ] > > Recently, I was working on a project where we were just reusing existing > terms for

How "valid" is to use a term marked as "unstable" for a data publisher/consumer?

2016-07-20 Thread Ghislain Atemezing
Hi all, [ Apologize if this question has been answered before in this group. ] Recently, I was working on a project where we were just reusing existing terms for building a knowledge base for a private company. When we were considering using for example foaf:birthday, I was told by someone