[apologies for cross-posting; please distribute]
---
(PLEASE DISTRIBUTE)
Second Call for Papers
INAP 2009
18th International
I am working on improving the semweb markup on an Australian government
Department of Health and Aging website, which has HTML and XML versions
of the medicines allowed for prescription and the amount the government
pays. It has various links to interesting documents, and we want to make
it
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
I am working on improving the semweb markup on an Australian government
Department of Health and Aging website, which has HTML and XML versions of
the medicines allowed for prescription and the amount the government
Hi Rick,
I think adding parts of RDFa into your XML without turning the whole XML
into some kind of XHTML document will not help much.
If you want to use RDFa and make your data part of the Semantic Web, why
don't you add more RDFa to your current HTML pages? I see that they do not
contain
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
(Like I said, it has different info from the HTML so adding RDFa to the
HTML won't work; also the XML has existing
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It was
a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have been some
progresssigh
Define 'markup'... you can just embed your
On 23/6/09 11:49, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
Well, since you didn't seem keen on converting all the XML to RDF I
didn't point you
Dan Brickley wrote:
On 23/6/09 11:49, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
Well, since you didn't seem keen on converting all the XML to
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It was
a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have been some
progresssigh
Define
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
Markup = annotation. Taking existing data and adding stuff to make it more
useful, without disrupting existing uses of that data (and without creating
the size/maintenance issues you get from duplication.)
One of
Hi Rick,
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progress
I rather think that using XML as the default representation for RDF was the
showstopper back then. RDF/XML is not a good
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding
metadata to any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG, MathML,
etc. Note, however, that in the current state, RDFa is being defined
only
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding metadata
to any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG,
Egon Willighagen wrote:
The problem here is to define what attributes your XML will use to
define the RDFa hooks... what attributes will define a new subject,
the predicate, and how you define the object...
Yes, we lose the html:base element and html:link, but why would we lose
the
Hello,
A nice example of the traps of data linking. The data seems to say
that Einstein was born in the Federal Republic of Germany. In fact, he
was born before the FRG was founded.
Take care
Oliver
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Rick Jellifferjelli...@allette.com.au wrote:
Egon Willighagen wrote:
Namespace... to solve this, you could do instead:
my:book xhtml:about=urn:ISBN:0091808189 xhtml:typeof=biblio:book
xhtml:property=dc:title
Canteen Cuisine
/my:book
where the prefix xhtml would be bound to the namespace belonging to
XHTML+RDFa...
At 10:48 PM 6/23/2009 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
I see that the 2008 draft
http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/rdfa-overview
says
RDFa itself is intended to be a technique that allows for adding metadata to
any (XML) markup document, including SMIL, RSS, SVG, MathML, etc. Note,
however,
Here's the reminder for Thursday's HCLS call.
New participants please see http://esw.w3.org/topic/HCLSIG and
http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Teleconferences and info about mibbit at
the end of this message.
Cheers,
Scott
== Conference Details ==
* Date of Call: Thursday June 25, 2009
Here's the reminder for tomorrow's LODD telcon.
Cheers,
Susie
== Conference Details == * Date of Call: Wednesday June 24, 2009 * Time of
Call: 11:00am Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200
(Cambridge, MA) * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France) * Dial-In #:
19 matches
Mail list logo
