tc)
2) Just ploughing ahead and using RDFa on XML even if nothing can use
it. (Would that be the case?)
3) Err, Something clever from people on this list.
Any ideas about what people do with RDF?
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
sting customers so we don't want to
alter that, though the idea of duplicating the XML data as RDF seems
workable but a terrible hack; and we want to avoid having a new datafeed.)
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
Dan Brickley wrote:
On 23/6/09 11:49, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It
was a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have
been some progresssigh
Well, since you didn't seem keen on converting all the X
Egon Willighagen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Rick Jelliffe wrote:
So there is still no convenient way to mark up existing XML as RDF? It was
a showstopper 10 years ago but I kind of expected there would have been some
progresssigh
Define 'markup'.
fined
only for the (X)HTML family of languages."
So I think I will go ahead and add some RDFa markup to the XML, so that
there is some data on the web which might stimulate developers or inform
them, and tell the client that we may need to change tack.
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
to embed this RDFa in the HTML more
easily too...
What is the necessary difference, for an RDFa engine, between
Canteen Cuisine
and
Canteen Cuisine
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
RDFa processor would also accept
*/@xshtml:property
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
metimes for pages.)
What is best practice here please? I suppose I could also use
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf too: is it ettiquette to say that some external
page is actually about a local identifier?
Cheers
Rick Jelliffe
s probably my mistake). If there is a problem
then, well... it is my bug:-(
So do the RDFa attributes use a prefix or not? And which namespace uri?
And is this in any spec?
That was the stumbling block the client didn't mind pioneering but they
didn't want just to make things up on th
