On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 16:28:10 +0200, João Eiras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
After a quick glance I have two sugestions.
a) the tcpsocket object could have a peerAddress property which
returns the IP of the peer. This is great to resolve addresses. Could
there be any security issues ?
Hi João,
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:07:36 +0100, Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Note that the WHATWG version of this draft is in heavy flux; there are
hundreds of outstanding comments on it. Is the intent that this
specification replace the
could point to this RFC and give some advice with
regards to which verbs must/may be supported. In addition to this the XHR
specification must describe how arbitrary verbs not in this RFC should be
handled (IMO they should be handled like GET's).
Cheers,
- Gorm Haug Eriksen
Hi Boris,
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 20:51:03 +0200, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At the moment, Gecko allows adding a single onprogress
DOMEventListener that's notified of download progress.
We would like to make two changes to the progress event setup:
1) Allow adding progress
the verb.
Cheers,
- Gorm Haug Eriksen
Haug Eriksen
