On Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:12:40 +0200, Cameron McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
▪ (1) “This specification introduces two methods which take a
selector (technically a group of selectors) as argument and return
the matched elements as result.”
Why not just call them a group of
Discussion seems to have died down, and it's there for people to look
at for themselves, but I wanted to forward this response from Roy
Fielding (HTTP URI editor), as there wasn't much push-back on it.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roy T. Fielding [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun
Hi Cameron, your feedback is much appreciated!
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:59:21 +0200, Cameron McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Since it's the introduction.
Ok, but with the current wording it sounds like you are contradicting
yourself, equivalent to something like “the methods take a
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
What do implementors and authors think of having more optional method
arguments in the DOM where that makes sense?
I frankly think it's a bad idea. For UA-provided objects, it significantly
increases the implementation complexity. Since the IDL used can't express
On Mon, 22 May 2006 12:32:32 +0200, Mark Nottingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
client. (XHR is a HTTP client API specification).
Taken. Thanks.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
