On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:37:12 +0200, Boris Zbarsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, my real issue is that the attempt at definition that currently
exists in the XMLHttpRequest spec doesn't make it clear what the terms
it's using mean.
Do you have any suggestions to improve it? I don't really
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
You can't use apply with new. What part of the spec says you can?
I haven't been able to find the part of the spec that addresses this at all. So
the question could also be posed as What part of the spec says you can't? And
apply is just an example; I don't know
The current draft of XMLHttpRequest spec says:
If the URI given to this method contains userinfo ([RFC3986], section 3.2.1)
then the user name and password specified MUST be used if the user and
password arguments are omitted. If the arguments are not omitted, they take
precedence, even if
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 20:43:11 +0200, Alexey Proskuryakov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a new feature that's not present in browsers yet? From my tests,
it looks like WinIE doesn't support userinfo at all, while Firefox takes
string values of whatever objects are passed as user/password,
Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
I agree the definition should be clear, I'll try to review the existing
one and suggest more precise wording if needed.
Awesome. Thanks!
-Boris
