On Sun, 20 Jul 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> > > According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
> >
> > That wasn't intentional -- can you point to where it says that? The HTML5
> > spec relies on spaces not be
On Jul 20, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
That wasn't intentional -- can you point to where it says that? The
HTML5 spec relies on spaces not being allo
Jonas Sicking wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
That wasn't intentional -- can you point to where it says that? The
HTML5 spec relies on spaces not being allowed in URLs in various places.
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jul 2008, Jonas Sicking wrote:
According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
That wasn't intentional -- can you point to where it says that? The HTML5
spec relies on spaces not being allowed in URLs in various places.
In section 2.3.2 (Pa
Julian Reschke wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
...
I don't think the angle brackets are necessary for forward compat,
since we can just disallow spaces from the URL.
According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
...
I don't think so.
But even if this was the case, it sh
Jonas Sicking wrote:
...
I don't think the angle brackets are necessary for forward compat,
since we can just disallow spaces from the URL.
According to the HTML5 spec space is a valid characted inside URLs.
...
I don't think so.
But even if this was the case, it shouldn't matter, as the U
