Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-08-04 Thread Marcos Caceres
Hi Steve, Cynthia, and Sally, On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Steven Faulkner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Marcos and Arthur, thanks for taking the comments into account. No probs. Thanks for taking the time to provide them. > can I suggest the last part: > "The user interface language MUST

Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-08-04 Thread Steven Faulkner
Hi Marcos and Arthur, thanks for taking the comments into account. can I suggest the last part: "The user interface language MUST also be accessible to screen readers, allowing relevant sections of text and functionality to be accessed by non-visual means." be replaced with something like: "The

Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-08-04 Thread Marcos Caceres
Art, Sally, Steve, All On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Arthur Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sally, Steve, All > > FYI, Cynthia Shelly [CS] submitted comments that are similar to the ones you > submitted regarding requirement #37 [37] of the Widgets Requirement LC WD > [LC]. > > Both Marcos

Re: Request for Comments on Widgets 1.0 Requirements Last Call WD

2008-08-04 Thread Arthur Barstow
Sally, Steve, All FYI, Cynthia Shelly [CS] submitted comments that are similar to the ones you submitted regarding requirement #37 [37] of the Widgets Requirement LC WD [LC]. Both Marcos [MC] and I [AB] replied to Cynthia's comments. We agree the wording in sentences #2 and #3 needs work