Re: XHR and AC4CSR Status [Was: [admin] Publishing moratorium for rest of 2008 - December 18 Deadline]

2008-11-27 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:08:57 +0100, Arthur Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anne - what are your thoughts on publishing XHR (v1) and AC4CSR by this moratorium? I'm asking not to necessarily push you, but rather to get some status and plans for these two specs as well as some potential

CSS WG comments on Selectors API

2008-11-27 Thread Daniel Glazman
Hi, The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace matching between previous versions of the doc and this one. We have no official comment to make on this document. /Daniel -- W3C CSS WG, Co-Chair

Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API

2008-11-27 Thread Lachlan Hunt
Daniel Glazman wrote: The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace matching between previous versions of the doc and this one. Are the minutes from this telcon available? We have no official comment

Re: [WebIDL] questions

2008-11-27 Thread Cameron McCormack
Kartikaya Gupta: Thanks for the quick fixes. I have one more (hopefully last) question: In section 4.5, the fourth bullet point says that interfaces with constants can't be implemented by ECMAScript native objects. Doesn't this exclude NodeFilter[1] from being implemented in native? This

Re: CSS WG comments on Selectors API

2008-11-27 Thread Daniel Glazman
Lachlan Hunt wrote: Daniel Glazman wrote: The CSS WG discussed the recent Selectors API LC during this week's conference call, including a discussion on the removal of namespace matching between previous versions of the doc and this one. Are the minutes from this telcon available?