Hi Marcos,
I am not aware of any feedback on your e-mail. Here is mine.
Best Regards,
Rainer
*
T-Mobile International
Terminal Technology
Rainer Hillebrand
Head of Terminal Security
Landgrabenweg 151, D-53227 Bonn
Germany
+49 171 5211056 (My T-Mobile)
+49
Hi Jonas,
We run the widgets from a server, which a web application renders into
the browser window using iFrames (a typical web widget
architecture). Each widget in its iFrame calls the Widget API getPref/
setPref methods, which are implemented in a locally injected JS
library. This
Hi Scott,
I see what you mean. My mistake: I completelly missed that part of the
email.
As for your implementation, of course this could be a solution that will
accommodate things.
Still, there is an important set of functionalities that the HTML5 specs
offer that is missed by the
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:06:14 -0800, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
However, when I do this:
var e = document.createEvent('Events');
alert( typeof e.timeStamp );
I get number in Opera and Firefox, and object in Webkit.
I get number in WebKit.
-- Darin
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:58:00 -0800, Darin Adler da...@apple.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:51 AM, Kartikaya Gupta wrote:
Interesting. What version did you try on? I used Chrome 1.0.154.48
and Safari 3.1 (525.13) on Windows.
The relevant version is the WebKit version rather than
Hi Marcos,
To facilitate addressing Action 293 (Add the tag: scheme to the
scheme pros and cons document), and to provide an easy way for other
members of the group to contribute to the widget scheme pros and cons
discussion, I copied your slide set to our wiki:
Hi All,
Is there a reason why the spec says to not send progress events
(upload and download) during synchronous requests, while still saying
that readystatechange events should be fired?
I guess it can be argued that progress events (especially the load
event) is less useful for synchronous
I'm not sure restricting access to a signature is desirable since
signatures are intended to be objects that can be evaluated etc -
there is even a widget requirement that they can be removed and
conveyed independently of the widget.
Thus I assume access to the signature is possible
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Scott Wilson
scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jonas,
We run the widgets from a server, which a web application renders into the
browser window using iFrames (a typical web widget architecture). Each
widget in its iFrame calls the Widget API
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 21:14:44 +0100, Kartikaya Gupta
lists.weba...@stakface.com wrote:
I updated to Safari 3.2 on Windows (which looks it also has WebKit
525.27.1) and you're right, it is now showing number instead of
object. I guess this was changed not too long ago. So then my question
10 matches
Mail list logo
