On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2009, at 12:39 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 10:55 PM, Nikunj Mehta
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Apr 10, 2009, at 3:13 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>
> Can some
Hi Marcos,
My fault: I completely missed the exchange you mentioned.
The comment is quite relevant if there is only one config.xml. But obviously
your response should have clarified that for us. I should have caught your
question and make a comment back then.
My personal opinion: while having
Doug & Chaals,
two-player game application at:
http://www.honte.eu
Currently in two parts:
1: a game viewer that is: script-free, declarative, and keyboard
navigable, with a few demonstration game openings:
http://www.honte.eu/watchGo/
2: the game application
On Apr 17, 2009, at 13:19 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 13:24, Robin Berjon wrote:
Trying to separate the discussion from the change request: would
you be satisfied if requirements to perform C14N were removed and
reliance on XSD data types for definition purposes were replaced
On Apr 15, 2009, at 21:00 , Jonas Sicking wrote:
This is a really bad reason not to rework the widget signing spec. I
really hope that there are other more technical reasons that is
keeping us from reworking the spec.
It's not an ideal reason, but it's not a bad one. This specification
has be
Hi Mark,
On 4/16/09 7:20 PM, Mark Davis wrote:
I just glanced at this, but the first line is wrong:
Internationalization, or i18n, is the automated process employed by a
user agent to select localized content from a widget package that
matches the language preferences of an end-user.
If you wan
Hi Yves,
On 4/17/09 5:37 AM, Yves Savourel wrote:
Hi Marcos,
A few notes:
=== From a localizer viewpoint (so maybe not from a user-agent efficiency
view), using the locale folders method is likely better than the localized
elements method:
Having a document with the same content in multiple
Hi Henri,
On 4/17/09 1:19 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Apr 17, 2009, at 13:24, Robin Berjon wrote:
Trying to separate the discussion from the change request: would you
be satisfied if requirements to perform C14N were removed and reliance
on XSD data types for definition purposes were replaced
On Apr 17, 2009, at 13:24, Robin Berjon wrote:
Trying to separate the discussion from the change request: would you
be satisfied if requirements to perform C14N were removed and
reliance on XSD data types for definition purposes were replaced
with something less scary (though in this case t
On Apr 16, 2009, at 10:51 , Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Apr 15, 2009, at 22:16, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
We are not using the transform chain where complexity and
performance issues occur,
The complexity concern I raised is that the last signing step needs
to run canonicalization and reserializa
10 matches
Mail list logo
