Hi Frederick,
Some tiny editorial changes
I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of This Document:
[[
h3 class=no-num no-tocNote to Last Call Reviewers/h3
pemThis section is non-normative./em/p
pThe editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback
and
also note that this would mean that a web site could try to knock out
other web based mashups that it didn't like.
i'm sure that browser vendors can provide an api for their debugging
clients, but this feature shouldn't be exposed to web content.
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, João Eiras wrote:
Please consider a typical webpage, that on first load, opens a database
(using openDatabase) and then creates a read-only transaction to read
data to initialize whatever needs initializing. If it's the first time
the user opens that webpage, the
Cameron McCormack c...@mcc.id.au wrote:
(Also I see that you’re using the “string” and “wstring”, and Lwide
string values. Are you of the opinion that Web IDL should introduce
those instead of DOMString?)
Shiki Okasaka sh...@google.com wrote:
In my opinion, it would be nice if we can use the
Hi,
I need confirmation that I understand the impact of F1 from the Finding
missing localized content, specifically how the dynamic setting of the
xml:base on the element influences subsequent localized content
resolving, so please review my understanding and correct me if I have
got it wrong.
Hi Frederick,
Some tiny editorial changes
I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of
This Document:
[[
h3 class=no-num no-tocNote to Last Call Reviewers/h3
pemThis section is non-normative./em/p
pThe editors of this specification respond rapidly to all feedback
and
Hi,
I'm confused with http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#Callback
It seems that it is not possible to write:
t.addListener(function() { ... });
without throwing a typeError when the callback is thrown. Does that mean that
you can never write an IDL
that will let you write foo(function()
On 29 Apr 2009, at 13:55, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Well... Doesn't Last Call suggest that you're actually beyond the
phase of
rapid changes?
LOL! hell no, that's when most changes happen because it's the only
time people pay enough attention to do an actual review. That's why
Last Call should
+1
I don't see the need for that paragraph.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 29, 2009, at 6:36 AM, ext Thomas Roessler wrote:
Hi Frederick,
Some tiny editorial changes
I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of
This Document:
[[
h3 class=no-num
On 4/29/09 2:32 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
+1
I don't see the need for that paragraph.
Ok, no probs. Leave it out.
Kind regards,
Marcos
comments inline, including proposals. thanks for the review
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 29, 2009, at 4:01 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi Frederick,
Some tiny editorial changes
I think we should add the following sub-section to the Status of
This Document:
[[
Hi,
I support all the recommendations/rejections below.
Kind regards,
Marcos
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Frederick Hirsch
frederick.hir...@nokia.com wrote:
comments inline, including proposals. thanks for the review
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 29, 2009, at
Below is the draft agenda for the April 30 Widgets Voice Conference
(VC).
Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics
via public-webapps is encouraged (as it can result in a shortened
meeting).
Logistics:
Time: 22:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00
2009/4/29 Max Froumentin max...@opera.com:
Hi,
I'm confused with http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#Callback
It seems that it is not possible to write:
t.addListener(function() { ... });
without throwing a typeError when the callback is thrown. Does that mean that
you can never write
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, John J. Barton wrote:
And then afterwards the |length| is ? one? three?
One.
If I iterate
for(var i = 0; i sesssionStore.length; i++) foo(i, sessionStore[i]);
what can I expect in foo()?
(0, null), (1, null),
Hi,
here are my personal preferences for the I18N model[0].
- Folder-based localization: A2 (editor's choice)
I don't feel strongly about this choice. I prefer it because it is
more flexible and more powerful, but I would understand if
implementers felt it did a bit more than necessary (I
Hi all,
I've made a first pass at an ED for widget URIs (which is needed, as
you can tell from the I18N discussion). It's in need of tightening up
editorially wise but the basic ideas are there:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-uri/
Share and Enjoy!
--
Robin Berjon -
Widgets dig sig and requirements are ready to be published. Widgets
dig sig going to LC! Hoping for feedback (yes, that means you Mozilla
guys:))
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/
If all goes to plan, they will be published tomorrow.
Kind
On Apr 29, 2009, at 10:16 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote:
There are multiple options:
b) we select an order of priority and we only consider one (the
first to match);
...
I don't have a strong opinion on this, but I do I have a preference
for a rule based on (b): if multiple locale
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, John J. Barton wrote:
I reiterate my criticism: using a length property in this type is
inconsistent with _javascript_ and with developers expectations about
objects. Every time we use this object we will make pointless mistakes
because
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, John J. Barton wrote:
I reiterate my criticism: using a length property in this type is
inconsistent with Javascript and with developers expectations about
objects. Every time we use this object we will make pointless mistakes
because the type mimics arrays only
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 1:30 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
I've changed it a bit, because it seems UAs are likely to still want a
per-origin limit. But I'm not really sure what to suggest that's more
concrete that the vague handwaving that is there now.
Yeah, I'm not sure how to guard
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:51:33 +0200, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Yes and Firebug has to have special code for HTMLCollection because this
mistake
was made in the past. Now we will have to have different special code for
Storage. Rather than modeling new API on old
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, John J Barton wrote:
Yes and Firebug has to have special code for HTMLCollection because this
mistake was made in the past. Now we will have to have different special
code for Storage. Rather than modeling new API on old mistakes, consider
learning from the past
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Adam Barth wrote:
By the way, there is a typo in this sentence:
A mostly arbitrary limit of five megabytes per origin is recommended.
Implementation feedback is welcome and will be used to update this
suggestion in _the_ future.
Thanks, fixed.
--
Ian Hickson
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009, John J. Barton wrote:
I could not figure out from the WebIDL what happens in this case:
sessionStore[2] = howdy; // no other keys in sessionStore
I guess this does not work like Javascript arrays or objects, rather I
expect it fails?
It
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, John J Barton wrote:
Yes and Firebug has to have special code for HTMLCollection because this
mistake was made in the past. Now we will have to have different special
code for Storage. Rather than modeling new API on old mistakes, consider
Sean Hogan wrote:
sessionStore[2] = howdy;
print(sessionStore[2]); // prints null?
Where, exactly? That gives howdy in Gecko, at least. At least with
s/sessionStore/window.sessionStorage/.
-Boris
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:51:33 +0200, John J Barton
johnjbar...@johnjbarton.com wrote:
Yes and Firebug has to have special code for HTMLCollection because
this mistake
was made in the past. Now we will have to have different special code
for
Storage. Rather than modeling
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Sean Hogan wrote:
sessionStore[2] = howdy;
print(sessionStore[2]); // prints null?
Where, exactly? That gives howdy in Gecko, at least. At least with
s/sessionStore/window.sessionStorage/.
-Boris
I was following the discussion, and the point is that array-like
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, John J Barton wrote:
So why call the property |length|? Wouldn't an enumerable JS host object
be just as fabulous with getNumberOfItems()?
All the other host objects use |length|.
But the part that has me confused is maybe just me being dumb. I just
have a hard
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Sean Hogan wrote:
sessionStore[2] = howdy;
print(sessionStore[2]); // prints null?
print(sessionStore[2]); // prints howdy
To my knowledge that's not consistent with any other object or interface
in the browser.
Unless I'm mistaken, they both print howdy.
--
Ian
Ian Hickson wrote:
There are lots of objects that are not arrays (or should not be rendered
as arrays) and yet have length. Collections, TimeRanges, select
elements, Window objects, History, CanvasPixelArrays, etc.
I'm not sure about all those objects, but my (incomplete) testing of
33 matches
Mail list logo
