Re: File API Feedback

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: > On Tue

Re: File API Feedback

On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Garrett Smith >>> wrote: On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue

Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules

Hi Marcos, Marcos Caceres wrote: Hi Francois, Just to be clear, I made the change you requested (relative and abs URIs behave exactly the same). I think that concludes all issues raised in this thread. Absolutely! For the Disposition of Comments, can we get your acknowledgment that you are

Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > For the sake of the DoC, can you live with the current i18n model? No.

Re: [widgets] Comments on Widgets 1.0: Packaging and configuration, 9.1 Processing rules

Hi Francois, Just to be clear, I made the change you requested (relative and abs URIs behave exactly the same). I think that concludes all issues raised in this thread. For the Disposition of Comments, can we get your acknowledgment that you are satisfied? Kind regards, Marcos On Tue, Jul 7, 200

Re: [widgets] P&C, outstanding feedbac...

For the sake of the DoC, can you live with the current i18n model? On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:45 AM, timeless wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> I talked to our localization guys about this, they said that is >> definitely not a good thing. They said any content is be

Re: widgets feedback

DoC: ok

Re: widgets feedback

Hi Josh, On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 12:17 AM, timeless wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: >>> If satisfied with the corrections, please give us >>> an OK for the DoC :) >> >> DoC: OK except for the bits below (and on

Re: Comments on Widgets spec

On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le mardi 07 juillet 2009 à 19:53 +0200, Marcos Caceres a écrit : >> For the sake of the Disposition of Comments, please let us know if you >> are satisfied with the fixes below (if possible, by the 9th of July). > > I'm mostly sati

[widgets] Draft Agenda for 9 July 2009 Voice Conference

Below is the Draft agenda for the July 9 Widgets Voice Conference (VC). Inputs and discussion before the meeting on all of the agenda topics via public-webapps is encouraged (as it may result in a shortened meeting). Logistics: Time: 22:00 Tokyo; 16:00 Helsinki; 15:00 Paris; 14:00 Londo

Request for Comments: LCWD of Geolocation API; deadline 31 July 2009

Hi All, The WebApps WG has been asked to submit comments re the Last Call Working Draft of the Geolocation WG's Geolocation API: If you have any comments, please send them to public- geolocat...@w3.org. Note the deadline for comments

Re: Comments on Widgets spec

Le mardi 07 juillet 2009 à 19:53 +0200, Marcos Caceres a écrit : > For the sake of the Disposition of Comments, please let us know if you > are satisfied with the fixes below (if possible, by the 9th of July). I'm mostly satisfied, but see a few comments below. > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:35 PM,