ISSUE-94: PC CR: Try to fallback to default start files when src path is
invalid or not existing [Widgets]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/94
Raised by: Marcos Caceres
On product: Widgets
On 31-July-2009, Marcos raised this Issue against the 23-July-2009 PC CR:
ISSUE-95: PC CR: Conformance checker behavior intermixed with UA behavior
[Widgets]
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/95
Raised by: Marcos Caceres
On product: Widgets
On 11-Aug-2009, Marcos raised this Issue against the 23-July-2009 PC CR:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
xhr.open(GET, myFile.slice(x, y).fileDataURI);
xhr.send();
FWIW I'm opposed to abusing XMLHttpRequest in this way and I actually think
that when using the filedata URL scheme some kind of exception needs to be
thrown.
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:38:24 +0200, David Levin le...@google.com wrote:
In http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest2/#credentials, it
says: The credentials flag takes the values true and false, true by
default...
Both Firefox and Safari have defaulted the value to False but the spec
says the
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 05:41:57 +0200, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
It appears that both Safari and Firefox ignore returned cookies from a
cross origin xhr when the credentials flag is set to false. This behavior
seems very reasonable.
Should the XMLHttpRequest level 2 spec indicate
The last XMLHttpRequest Working Draft was a Last Call Working Draft. As it
turned out a number of changes had to be made again. Meanwhile HTML5 also got
further along and integration with the event loop as well as the storage mutex
was desired. These are now integrated.
The Forms WG asked for
Garrett Smith wrote:
In glancing at some of the methods in FileAPI, I noticed some coding
errors.
There definitely were errors; thank you for catching them.
First, an overview explanation:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileUpload/publish/FileAPI.xhtml#dfn-getAsDataURL
|... If the call is
I will be out of the office starting Fri 08/07/2009 and will not return
until Mon 08/17/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
Gregg Tavares wrote:
How about this?
Why make a new API for getting the contents of a file (local or otherwise)
when we already have one which is XHR?
What if FileList was just array of File objects where each File object is
just a URL in the format
filedata: uuid, filename
Then you can use
splice should synchronously return a new FileData object. No need for
asynchronous callback since no IO occurs.
Done, though I used Anne's suggestion to make it an attribute.
Whoops, no I didn't mean Anne's suggestion for slice -- I meant it for
getAsURL.
Also the current draft is:
Adam de Boor wrote:
this is a minor point, but I'm finding the name of the splice method to be
odd. To me splice means to join, and slice would seem a more appropriate
name. The Array object has both splice and slice, and the former is used for
removing and inserting data and modifies the array
Latest draft is:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileUpload/publish/FileAPI.html
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Thanks for the update to the draft! Below some feedback:
In the table of contents the link to the filedata URL scheme is broken.
Fixed.
The Web IDL syntax needs to be updated. E.g.
Michael Nordman wrote:
The draft says a new UUID should be 'coined' for each method invocation.
(Why is that?) Given the coinage of a new url on each access, accessing it
thru an attribute feels a little odd.
This should have been an editor's note, and not a part of the spec.
text. The
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:09 +0200, Stewart Brodie stewart.bro...@antplc.com
wrote:
Please could you add an appendix in the latter that summarises what's
new in the new version?
Is there anything the Abstract does not cover you would like to see mentioned?
I believe it is true to say that
Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:17:09 +0200, Stewart Brodie
stewart.bro...@antplc.com wrote:
Please could you add an appendix in the latter that summarises what's
new in the new version?
Is there anything the Abstract does not cover you would like to see
On Wednesday, August 12, 2009, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
xhr.open(GET, myFile.slice(x, y).fileDataURI);
xhr.send();
FWIW I'm opposed to abusing XMLHttpRequest in this way and I actually think
that when
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 7:42 AM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
What's the use-case for getAsBase64?
It's generally hard to encode files and to send them to servers. While Data
URLs give developers a convenient way to work with Base64, URL length
limitations across user agents make
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:09:20 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2009, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
wrote:
xhr.open(GET, myFile.slice(x, y).fileDataURI);
xhr.send();
FWIW
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Anne van Kesterenann...@opera.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:09:20 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Wednesday, August 12, 2009, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:57:51 +0200, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Arun Ranganathana...@mozilla.com wrote:
Dan Connolly wrote:
Looks like the word is getting out about this work;
there's a pretty favorable article on ajaxian.
http://ajaxian.com/archives/w3c-publish-first-working-draft-of-file-api
But it's a little
There are quite a few things I'd like to do still on this draft, leaving
aside the question of changing the API, which I'd like to see more
discussion on [1]. It's worth documenting these things as ToDos so
the WG knows I'm working on them:
1. Terser, clearer prose on asynchronous accessor
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Aaron Boodman wrote:
The API was intentionally made more obviously synchronous to avoid
having to make people use callbacks.
Would making all transactions automatically rollback if not committed
when the event loop spins be an acceptable substitute solution?
A
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 3 Aug 2009, Aaron Boodman wrote:
The API was intentionally made more obviously synchronous to avoid
having to make people use callbacks.
Would making all transactions automatically rollback if not committed
when
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:13:57 +0200, Arun Ranganathan a...@mozilla.com wrote:
Latest draft is:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileUpload/publish/FileAPI.html
Thanks Arun!
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
I have not received any feedback on my comments as to
Hello,
We recently started a draft to provide timing-related APIs in browsers.
The goal is to add the missingpieces in webapp latency measurements using
Javascript. As a starter, right now we've only include a
minimum set of interfaces we consider necessary, which mainly focuse on the
time and
25 matches
Mail list logo
