On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
When scanning the Test Suite Version of the PC spec I noticed some MAY and
OPTIONAL assertions for which there are no associated test assertions. This
implies these assertions aren't really necessary and should be
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Marcos, All,
During the processing of content in Step 7, if the custom start file is
bogus (and the spec indicates a few reasons why it could be bogus), widget
start file will be null when the UA completes Step 7. In
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Marcsos, All, - given the next publication of the widgets PC spec will be a
LCWD, should the feature at risk stuff (its:dir) be deleted?
I don't know :( I think we should remove the at risk, and just run
with it. It's
On Oct 6, 2009, at 12:46 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Arthur Barstow
art.bars...@nokia.com wrote:
Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23-
July-2009
Candidate) either has been implemented or is being implemented?
No, we do not have any
Hi Marcos,
The position of the object element in the example provided in
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/ section 1.4 is not correct in that
the object occurs before the SignatureValue.
The DTD provided fo the XMLDIG11
http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-xmldsig-core1-20090226/xmldsig-core-schema.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
My main issues are the following:
File interface is separate from FileData and that makes little sense at
this time. Can't the two be merged in to File? (Use case 3 - all the
metadata)
The idea was that FileData
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com wrote:
I figure I could rewrite Jonas' proposal to make it more palatable (at least
to me) and satisfy the use cases and priorities I mentioned in [1]. Here's
his proposal to combine with File and FileData from the current
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta nikunj.me...@oracle.com
wrote:
I figure I could rewrite Jonas' proposal to make it more palatable
