On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Charles McCathieNevile
cha...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:23:38 +0100, Adrian Bateman adria...@microsoft.com
wrote:
...As I noted at TPAC, at Microsoft we don't think we'll collectively be
able to achieve reasonable interop because of the SQL
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
On Nov 20, 2009, at 00:22 , Adam Barth wrote:
It's emails like this that make me skeptical of the security work
being done in the device APIs working group.
*sigh* I feel like a broken record. It feels like I've spent my
Starting a new thread since the other one was more of a
meta-discussion, this one has more technical meat on it.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com wrote:
On Nov 20, 2009, at 17:40 , Adam Barth wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 8:34 AM, Robin Berjon ro...@berjon.com
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
Hmm.. This is a very interesting idea. Definitely worth exploring more.
What I had in mind was basically something like this:
1. An API for creating File objects by concatinating strings, Blobs,
ByteArrays (or whatever
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
MarkM and I have produced a draft specification for the GuestXHR
functionality we've been advocating. The W3C style specification
document is attached. We look forward to any feedback on it.
We agree with others that
Hello,
I have a LAMP based database application without JS on my server (well, with
PostgreSQL). Now I want to make it Ajax/Offline compliant. I've done all my
data manipulation/querying with pre-coded SQL statements into the PHP
application. In last week I've tried to find out the right way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Forsberg wrote:
Hello,
I have a LAMP based database application without JS on my server
(well, with PostgreSQL). Now I want to make it Ajax/Offline
compliant. I've done all my data manipulation/querying with
pre-coded SQL statements into
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
I've only had time for a quick scan, but this looks like a very good proposal.
Thanks.
Is there a reason why a full XMLHttpRequest API couldn't be used? I
guess in its most simple incarnation things like setRequestHeader
