Hi All,
On Jan 12, 2010, at 10:42 AM, ext Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
On Jan 12, 2010, at 3:48 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Was that Advisory Committee Review process followed for any of the
other specs we're working on that are not mentioned by name in the
charter? I listed a number of them in my
Hi All,
I have modified the VMMF draft at http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ and
merged the comments from Vodafone after reviewing them.
I have the following questions that I would like to agree on (the VMMF text
highlights the corresponding content):
1. Does the interactivity affect the
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com wrote:
The most it can do is ignore such information. It is up to the
client not to provide such information. It is the job of the standard to
require the
All,
Back in December I volunteered (http://www.w3.org/2009/12/10-wam-minutes.html)
to propose an alteration / supplement to WARP to permit widget access to
resources on local networks with no managed DNS system. Such resources do not
fit into the current WARP model of listing origins in the
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8758
Summary: Define DOMContentLoaded
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
The confidentiality of a resource can be compromised by a CSRF
vulnerability in a legitimate client.
Can you define what you mean by CSRF? I think we must have different
ideas about what the term means because I don't
It seems that we feel that when a File object is sent via either Form or
XHR, the latest underlying version should be used. When we get a slice via
Blob.slice, we assume that the underlying file data is stable since then.
So for uploader scenario, we need to cut a big file into multiple pieces.
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Adam Barth w...@adambarth.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Tyler Close tyler.cl...@gmail.com wrote:
The confidentiality of a resource can be compromised by a CSRF
vulnerability in a legitimate client.
Can you define what you mean by CSRF? I think
