On 22 Feb 2010, at 18:11, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Dear i18n core,
I'm writing on behalf of the Web Apps WG about the possibility of
conducting a joint teleconference to discuss some issues with the
ITS [1] features in the Widgets 1.0 Family of Specifications.
Basically, we would like to di
Dear i18n core,
I'm writing on behalf of the Web Apps WG about the possibility of
conducting a joint teleconference to discuss some issues with the ITS
[1] features in the Widgets 1.0 Family of Specifications.
Basically, we would like to discuss:
1. Moving ITS functionality out of the Widget
On 2/20/10 11:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Olli Pettay wrote:
On 2/19/10 5:09 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Wellington Fernando de Macedo wrote:
Frame boundary bits are taken account in bufferedAmount?
This is surprising. Very surprising.
Web Socket API is abou
Sorry about the slow response time.
On Feb 12, 2010, at 16:07, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> What we are discussing is if Mozilla's solution for signing Zip files
> (JAR-based) [1] is easier for vendors to implement/maintain and authors to
> deal with when compared to the W3C Widget solution of using
