On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Michael Nordman wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>>
>> The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from > type="saveas">. What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource
>> with Content-Disposition: attachment th
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from type="saveas">. What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource
> with Content-Disposition: attachment that would trigger the browser's
> download manager.
Ugh, I wasn't awa
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from type="saveas">. What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource
> with Content-Disposition: attachment that would trigger the browser's
> download manager.
When it comes t
The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from . What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource
with Content-Disposition: attachment that would trigger the browser's
download manager.
-Darin
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> What's the use case for
Ah... the "save as" ability associated with the FileWriter API does change
the equation a bit. My main motivation for setting Content-Disposition was
to trigger the user-agents download manager when navigating to these urls
instead of trying to display them in a browser frame.
On Tue, Mar 30, 201
What's the use case for specifying the Content-Disposition mime type.
The ones I've heard so far seems better solved using the FileWriter
[1] API.
[1] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/file-system/file-writer.html
/ Jonas
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Michael Nordman wrote:
> There is more than jus
There is more than just the mime type when dealing with the URLs.
There at least two content headers of interest, Content-Type
and Content-Disposition.
Whatever mechanism involved should allow for both of these content headers
to be set
by the web application.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jon
There is more than just the mime type when dealing with the URLs.
There at least two content headers of interest, Content-Type
and Content-Disposition.
Whatever mechanism involved should allow for both of these content headers
to be set
by the web application.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jon
On Mar 30, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Pablo Castro wrote:
On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro > wrote:
Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me
busy. I agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread
th
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Pablo Castro
wrote:
> On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro <
> pablo.cas...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
> agree with all
On Tue, March 30, 2010 at 2:53 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro
>> wrote:
>> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
>> agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required,
>> so I won't redundantly
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>> > Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why URN is
>> > not
>> > a property of Blob. It seems like i
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> > Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why URN is
> not
> > a property of Blob. It seems like it would be useful to be able to load
> a
> > slice of a File. F
Hi, Maciej-
+Nikunj
Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 3/29/10 10:51 PM):
My only serious concern is the Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving
entry - I think it's just factually incorrect.
Here is the first Editor's Draft of WebSimpleDB:
It does not include Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving. I
Hey all,
The spec is unspecified as to what we should do when a database is
opened with a different description than it was previously opened. I'd
assume we'd want to update it, but maybe folks have other ideas.
Cheers,
Shawn
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
> On 3/22/2010 10:49 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
>
>> On 3/13/2010 1:43 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
>>
>>> As specced, it is possible to have multiple concurrent requests at
>>> various API entry points, except for the IndexedDatabaseRequest
>>> inte
On 3/22/2010 10:49 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote:
On 3/13/2010 1:43 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote:
As specced, it is possible to have multiple concurrent requests at
various API entry points, except for the IndexedDatabaseRequest
interface. In this particular case, you can only have one request to
open a dat
On 29/03/10 5:16 PM, Phillips, Addison wrote:
This doesn't make any sense to me. I think you are over-thinking this.
The author element contains the author's *NAME*. It can also include an href
and an email attribute. UTR#36 refers explicitly to IRIs and IDNA addresses,
which would be the va
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Pablo Castro wrote:
> Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I
> agree with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required,
> so I won't redundantly mark each with "same here", but I have a few comments
> on one or tw
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Kris Zyp wrote:
>> I believe computer science has clearly
>> observed the fragility of passing callbacks to the initial function
>> since it conflates the
Sorry for having disappeared for a while, "odata" was keeping me busy. I agree
with all the clarifications listed in this thread that are required, so I won't
redundantly mark each with "same here", but I have a few comments on one or two
of them below.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Jeremy
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why URN is not
> a property of Blob. It seems like it would be useful to be able to load a
> slice of a File. For example, this could be used by an application to fetch
> all of it
22 matches
Mail list logo
