RE: comments

2010-06-03 Thread Jim Allan
Thanks to Dave for providing UAWG access to the changed language. We are ok with the changes. Thanks for letting us comment late. Jim > -Original Message- > From: Jim Allan [mailto:jimal...@tsbvi.edu] > Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 8:59 AM > To: 'art.bars...@nokia.com' > Cc: 'marc..

Re: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)

2010-06-03 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Pablo Castro wrote: > > From: Jeremy Orlow > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:54 AM > > >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking > wrote: > >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow > wrote: > >> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote: > >> >> > >

RE: Can IndexedDB depend on JavaScript? (WAS: [Bug 9793] New: Allow dates and floating point numbers in keys)

2010-06-03 Thread Pablo Castro
From: Jeremy Orlow Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2010 6:54 AM >> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 9:21 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: >> > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:42 PM, wrote: >> >> >> >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9793 >> >> >> >>      

Re: HTML5 File

2010-06-03 Thread イアンフェッティ
Actually, I should take that back. Some of the device specs are definitely relevant, though I have concerns about the direction they are heading. Either way though, it seems strange for the filesystem apis to be split. On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) wrote: > Were it not for

Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal

2010-06-03 Thread Mike Belshe
Correct. Sorry. Here is an updated doc: https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/document/pub?id=1TcKtHi-XUVKXj9erQkkBXdidnG78lhK04D-2lh4O51Y Mike On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 2:11 AM, timeless wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: > > Changes: > >* changed the setPriority(

Re: HTML5 File

2010-06-03 Thread イアンフェッティ
Were it not for file* I, and perhaps Google as a whole, would likely leave DAP (though I cannot speak for everyone). Nothing else there is of interest to me right now. On Jun 3, 2010 4:13 AM, "Robin Berjon" wrote: > On Jun 2, 2010, at 23:02 , Jonas Sicking wrote: >> I don't know who makes these d

[widgets] Draft minutes 3 June 2010 voice conf

2010-06-03 Thread Arthur Barstow
The draft minutes from the June 3 Widgets voice conference are available at the following and copied below: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-wam-minutes.html WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send them to the public-webapps mail list before June 17 (the next Widgets

RE: comments

2010-06-03 Thread Jim Allan
UAWG is having a meeting today. I don't anticipate any issues. Will send you something after the meeting. Jim > -Original Message- > From: w3c-wai-ua-requ...@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-requ...@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Arthur Barstow > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 8:08 AM > To: jimal...@tsb

Re: HTML5 File

2010-06-03 Thread Robin Berjon
On Jun 2, 2010, at 23:02 , Jonas Sicking wrote: > I don't know who makes these decisions, but I'd imagine the editor > holds a certain amount of sway. Decisions of what is in scope for a WG are made by the members (i.e. you) when a WG is created. When DAP was created, people felt rather strongly

Re: HTML5 File

2010-06-03 Thread Robin Berjon
On Jun 2, 2010, at 22:14 , Jonas Sicking wrote: > It keeps seeming to me that moving the file-writer spec to WebApps > would make much more sense... It's certainly a discussion that we can look into, but before we try to re-engineer everything I'd like to ask a stupid question: did the OP not fin

Re: XMLHttpRequest Priority Proposal

2010-06-03 Thread timeless
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Mike Belshe wrote: > Changes: >    * changed the setPriority() method to be an attribute "priority" > Applications may alter the priority by calling the setPriority() method on > the XMLHttpRequest object. >  The priority set on the object at the time the applica